Journals →  Tsvetnye Metally →  2011 →  #8-9 →  Back

HEAVY NON-FERROUS METALS
ArticleName Physical-chemical researches of general regularities of hydrolysis of ferrous (III) sulphate in hydrothermal conditions
ArticleAuthor Kitay A. G., Bryukvin V. A., Dyachenko V. T., Bolshikh A. O., Korneev V. A.
ArticleAuthorData

Problem Laboratory MMC Norilsk Nickel

A. G. Kitay, Senior Research Officer
V. A. Bryukvin, Head of Laboratory, ph.: (499) 135- 87-30

A. O. Bolshikh, Principal Engineer
V. A. Korneev, Senior Researcher

 

MMC Norilsk Nickel

V. T. Dyachenko, Chief of Scientific and Technical Direction

Abstract

Degree of hydrolysis of ferrous (III) sulphate and also iron and sulphur contents in residuals and its phase and granulometric content have been determined on model solutions of iron ferro-sulphate under the conditions of its autoclave oxidation. Changeable parameters was: temperature (100–200 oC) and content of basic iron (II) sulphate in solution (~10 and 40 g/l). Partial pressure of oxygen is 1 MPa, duration is 1 hour. By obtained results it has been determined that hematite has been stable formed in hydrolysis process in temperatures interval, equals to 180–200 oC, under the conditions of temperature as 120–160 oC gothite has been formed. Temperature raising in process of Fe (II) oxidation and iron (III) sulphate hydrolysis lead to reducing of iron content in settling and degree of hydrolysis. With 200 oC sulphur content in settling was ~1%, iron was 62%, raising of iron (II) content in basic solution was since ~10 until 40 g/l leads to forming more fine particles in settling. With 200 oC, average size of settling particles, obtained from solutions, which contained ~10 g/l of Fe (II) was 14.4 μm, and from solutions, contained ~40 g/l of Fe (II) was 1.7 μm.

keywords Autoclave process, hydrothermal hydrolysis, ferro-sulphate, x-ray phase analysis, dispersion analysis, Mossbauer spectroscopy
References

1. Naboychenko S. S., Shneerson L. M., Kalashnikova M. I. and etc. Avtoklavnaya gidrometallurgiya tsvetnykh metallov (Pressure Hydrometallurgy of Non-ferrous Metals). Vol. 2. Ekaterinburg, 2009.

2. Shneerson Ya. M., Shpaer V. M., Kleshchev D. G. and etc. Novye protsessy v metallurgii nikelya, medi i kobalta. Teoriya i praktika : Trudy AO «Institut Gipronikel» (New Processes in Metallurgy of Nickel, Copper and Cobalt : Transactions of «Institute Gipronikel» Conpany). Moscow, 2000. pp. 38–49.

3. Khudyakov I. F., Klyueva A. V., Smirnov V. I. Dokl. AN. Reports of Academy of Sciences. 1963. Vol. 148, No. 3. p. 654.

4. Dousma J., Bruyn P. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1976. Vol. 56, No. 3. p. 527.

5. Ruiz M., Zapata J., Padilla R. Hydrometallurgy. 2007. Vol. 89. p. 32.

6. Vasserman I. M. Khimicheskoe osazhdenie iz rastvorov (Chemical Precipitation from Solutions). Leningrad, 1980. 208 pp.

7. Gipergennye okisly zheleza v geologicheskikh protsessakh : kollektiv avtorov (Supergene Iron Oxides in Geological Processes : collective of authors). Moscow, 1975. 207 pp.

8. Vracar R., Cerovic K. Hydrometallurgy. 1997. Vol. 44. p. 113.

9. Galyy V. P. Gidrookisi metallov (Metal Hydroxides). Kiev, 1972. 151 pp.

10. Margulis E. V., Getskin L. S., Zapuskhlova N. A. and etc. Izvestiya vuzov. Tsvetnaya metallurgiya.Proceedings of higher school. Non-ferrous metallurgy. 1977. No. 5. p. 49.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back