Financial University under the Government of Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)

I. Yu. Novoselova, Dr. Econ., Prof., Dept. of Industrial Markets, iunov2010@yandex.ru
A. V. Sharkova, Dr. Econ., Prof., Dept. of Industrial Markets, AVSharkova@fa.ru
O. N. Vasilyeva, Cand. Jur., Associate Prof., Dept. of Legal Regulation of Economic Activity, ONVasileva@fa.ru

Iron and steel enterprises are currently making great efforts to reduce the negative impact on the environment and implement important social projects in their areas of responsibility. To create an effective set of social and cultural projects, it is necessary to consider the priorities of different population groups and the availability of financial resources from the enterprise. The article presents an enlarged scheme of information and logical connections between the stages of forming socio-cultural projects developed by the authors, a mechanism for forming such projects based on assessing the priority of projects based on public opinion surveys and the authors’ algorithm for processing them, a mathematical model for forming an optimal set of projects, and an iterative algorithm for determining the optimal amount of funding to assess public satisfaction with the selected projects. The scientific novelty is the multicriteria model of forming an optimal set of projects, which ensures the same degree of satisfaction of the interests of all population groups. The approbation of the developed mechanism of forming projects using a specially developed software package demonstrates the efficiency of the proposed methodological support and allows us to reveal in detail all steps of forming socio-cultural projects on a numerical example.

1. Skorobogatova Yu. A., Shupletsov A. F., Lukina E. M. The role and significance of social responsibility of business in the metallurgical industry. Problemy sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Sibiri. 2024. No. 3. pp. 103–109. DOI: 10.18324/2224-1833-2024-3-103-109
2. Kusov S. V. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the preservation of employee health. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra. 2023. Vol. 13. No. 12А. pp. 19–26. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2024.51.82.003
3. Bakhov A. A. Corporate social responsibility in the metallurgical industry: the experience of PJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel. Ekonomika novogo mira. 2021. Vol. 6. No. 3. pp. 43–53. DOI: 10.35231/25419501_2021_3_43
4. Nicolae M., Sohaciu M. G., Dumitrescu R., CiucR S., Nicolae A. Vectors of Sustainable Development and Global Knowledge in the Metallic Materials Industry in Romania. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14 (16). 9911. DOI: 10.3390/su14169911
5. Oliinyk O., Mishchuk H., Vasa L., Kozma K. Social Responsibility: Opportunities for Integral Assessment and Analysis of Connections with Business Innovation. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15 (6). 5608. DOI: 10.3390/su15065608
6. Kogdenko V. G., Kazakova N. A. Analysis of risk stability for different kinds of ferrous metallurgy companies in sanction conditions. Chernye metally. 2024. No. 3. pp. 83–88.
7. Malyshev M. K. On the social responsibility of large businesses (on the example of PJSC Severstal). Sotsialnoe prostranstvo. 2020. Vol. 6 (1). pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.15838/sa.2020.1.23.5
8. Gudkov B. N., Guskov Yu. V. Justification of the priority selection of investment projects based on the analytic hierarchy process method. Vestnik MPGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2022. No. 2 (32). pp. 55–65. DOI: 10.25688/2312-6647.2022.32.2.06
9. Surkov A. A. Application of the method of pairwise comparisons when combining economic forecasts. Uchet. Analiz. Audit. 2019. No. 6 (3). pp. 32–42. DOI: 10.26794/2408-9303-2019-6-3-32-42
10. Posadskiy A. I., Sivakova T. V., Sudakov V. A. Aggregation of fuzzy expert judgments. Preprinty IPM im. M. V. Keldysha. 2019. No. 101. 12 p. DOI: 10.20948/prepr-2019-101
11. Mukhametzyanov I. Z. Fuzzy logical inference and fuzzy hierarchy process analysis method in decision support systems: application to reliability assessment of technical systems. Kibernetika i programmirovanie. 2017. No. 12. pp. 59–77. DOI: 10.7256/2306–4196.2017.2.21794
12. Huan Liu. Fuzzy hierarchy process analysis method for selecting an e-commerce website. Vestnik BGU. Ser. 1. 2014. No. 3. pp. 89–93.
13. Artamonov V. S., Labinsky A. Yu., Utkin O. V. Modification of the fuzzy hierarchy process analysis method. Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo Universiteta Gosugarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby MChS Rossii. 2016. No. 4. pp. 77–84.
14. Krivulin N. K., Abildaev T., Gorshechnikova V. D. On solving multicriteria decision-making problems based on paired comparisons. Kompyuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii. 2020. No. 2. pp. 27–58. DOI: 10.32603/2071–2340-2020-2-27-58
15. Peftibay G. I., Galukhin N. A., Ivakhnenko A. V. Parametric method for calculating triangular weighting coefficients in the matrix of pairwise comparisons. Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo Universiteta Gosugarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby MChS Rossii. 2023. No. 3. pp. 54–62. DOI: 10.61260/2218-13X-2023-3-54-62
16. Novoselova I. Yu., Novoselov A. L. Optimal investment in socially significant events in the region based on public-private partnership. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 5. pp. 96–106. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849x-2024-17-5-96-106
17. Novoselov A. L., Novoselova I. Yu., Zheltenkov A. V. Formation of an Optimal Set of Regional Development Projects Taking into Account the Interests of the Population and Regional Authorities. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2018. No. 1. pp. 59–69. DOI: 10.18384/2310–6646-2018-1-59-69
18. Dymont N. A., Malaeva E. D., Yakhyaeva G. E. Algorithms for verifying the correctness of interval expert evaluations. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Informatsionnye tekhnologii. 2024. Vol. 22. No. 2. pp. 5–19. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7900-2024-22-2-5-19
19. Novoselova I. Yu., Novoselov A. L. Formation of corporate social responsibility projects when creating an oil pipeline system. Nauka i tekhnologii truboprovidnogo transporta nefti i nefteproduktov. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 1. pp. 89–96. DOI: 10.28999/2541-9595-2025-15-1-89-96
20. Nian Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Qiang Pan, Guiwu Wei. Multi-attribute decision-making method with triangular fuzzy numbers based on regret theory and the catastrophe progression method. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2022. Vol. 19. No. 12. pp. 12013-12030. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2022559
21. Akram M., Muhiuddin G., Santos-García G. An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2022. Vol. 19. No. 7. pp. 7201–7231. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2022340
22. Yuting Zhu, Wenyu Zhang, Junjie Hou, Hainan Wang, Tingting Wang, Haining Wang. The large-scale group consensus multiattribute decision-making method based on probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 2024. Vol. 21. No. 3. pp. 3944–3966. DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2024175
23. Garrett D. F., Georgiadis G., Smolin A., Szentes B. Optimal technology design. Journal of Economic Theory. 2023. Vol. 209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2023.105621
24. Šerifi V., DašiT P., Curcic S., Stojkovic Z. Algorithm approach of the implementation of investment building project with the analysis of optimal choice of construction assignment. Technics Technologies Education Management (TTEM). 2012. Vol. 7 (1). pp. 305–308.