Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2026 →  #3 →  Back

DEVELOPMENT OF DEPOSITS
ArticleName Making project decisions under limited data conditions in hydrocarbon field development
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2026.03.07
ArticleAuthor Karsakov A. V., Sharf I. V.
ArticleAuthorData

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia

A. V. Karsakov, Post-Graduate Student, avkarsakov@mail.ru
I. V. Sharf, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Associate Professor

Abstract

The relevance of the study is driven by the necessity to substantiate development planning for new fields and those with hard-to-recover hydrocarbon reserves, particularly when facing insufficient initial geological and engineering data of questionable reliability. The objective of this work is to develop and validate a two-stage methodological algorithm for selecting analog fields during development design. This algorithm combines qualitative filtering with a quantitative assessment of similarity degree based on a composite calculation of parameter weighting coefficients. The object of the study is the Paleozoic deposits of a field in Western Siberia. As a result, an enhanced methodological algorithm for analog selection has been proposed. Its distinctive feature involves a combined approach to determining parameter weights, incorporating the coefficient of variation method, partial derivative analysis, and calculation of Sobol’s indices. This ensures a comprehensive consideration of both statistical variability of parameters and their physical impact on filtration processes. Validation of the methodological algorithm confirmed its practical significance, enabling refinement of key design parameters and adjustment of the development system for the target field. The permissible flexibility in the number of analyzed parameters has been established. The proposed methodological algorithm minimizes subjectivity, enables quantitative assessment of inter-object similarity, and facilitates verification of missing design parameters for constructing reliable hydrodynamic models. In the context of national strategic objectives, the proposed algorithm serves as a tool for mitigating investment risks and enhancing project economic efficiency through more justified selection of development systems and oil recovery technologies at early design stages.

keywords Field development, analog field, decision-making, hydrocarbon resources, parameter weighting factor, coefficient of variation, Sobol’s indices, sensitivity analysis
References

1. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1312459681 (accessed: 05.08.2025).
2. Podnebesnykh A. V., Khafizov A. R. Technique express estimation of analogue object for hydrocarbon reserves on the basis of their geological signs. Problemy sbora, podgotovki i transporta nefti i nefteproduktov. 2019. No. 3(119). pp. 9–18.
3. Glukhikh I. N., Nikiforov D. V. Decision making for modeling of oil and gas fields by using case based reasoning. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Fizikomatematicheskoe modelirovanie. Neft, gaz, energetika. 2019. Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 147–163.
4. Solodov I. S., Shakshin V. P., Kolesnikov V. A., Khamitov I. G., Ustinov A. S. Statistic approaches towards the disclosure of oil fields analogous to Samara region. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo. 2011. No. 6. pp. 30–33.
5. Vologin I. S., Islamov R. R., Nigmatullin F. N., Kharisova A. V., Loznyuk O. A. Methodology for selecting an analogous object for oil and gas reservoirs to geological and physical characteristics. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo. 2019. No. 12. pp. 124–127.
6. Koshelev A. T., Soloveva V. N., Orlova I. O., Datsenko E. N. The problem of prospecting for fields-analogues and the method applied for its salvation. Stroitelstvo neftyanykh i gazovykh skvazhin na sushe i na more. 2014. No. 7. pp. 10–12.
7. Abdrakhmanova E. K., Islamov R. R., Kuzin I. G., Nigmatullin F. N., Antakov I. S. et al. Improving the efficiency of development new oil and gas condensate reservoirs using a method for selecting an analogue. Ekspozitsiya Neft Gaz. 2022. No. 7(92). pp. 66–69.
8. Sun S., Pollitt D. A. An Empirical Analog Benchmarking Workflow to Improve Hydrocarbon Recovery. SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering. 2022. Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 349–366.
9. Kuzmichev O. B., Gazizov R. K., Vlasov S. V., Antonov M. S. The unified information system of geological and geophysical data is the basis of a multidisciplinary approach to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons. Neftyanoe khozyaystvo. 2024. No. 2. pp. 8–13.
10. Karsakov A. V., Zyatikov P. N., Sinebryukhov K. V., Sharf I. V. Improving the selection of object-analogues of oil and gas fields in designing reservoir engineering. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, Geo Assets Engineering. 2025. Vol. 336, No. 1. pp. 88–97.
11. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/561372501 (accessed: 05.10.2025).
12. Glagolev M. V. Sensitivity analysis of the model. Dinamika okruzhayushchey sredy i globalnye izmeneniya klimata. 2012. Vol. 3, No. 3. pp. 31–53.
13. Shcheglevatykh R. V., Sysoev A. S. Mathematical model to detect anomalies using Sensitivity Analysis applying to neural network. Modelirovanie, optimizatsiya i informatsionnye tekhnologii. 2020. Vol. 8, No. 1(28).

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back