Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2025 →  #6 →  Back

INDUSTRY SAFETY AND LABOUR PROTECTION
ArticleName Monitoring infrastructure built on permafrost and geocryology of operating area of Nornickel’s Polar Division
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2025.06.16
ArticleAuthor Kotov P. I., Pryamitsky A. V., Kunchulia G. M., Shmelev D. G.
ArticleAuthorData

Nornickel’s Polar Division, Norilsk, Russia

P. I. Kotov, Chief Manager of Department for Scientific and Technical Supervision of Operation of Buildings and Structures in the Extreme North, Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, KotovPI@nornik.ru
A. V. Pryamitsky, Senior Manager of Center for Technical Expertise
G. M. Kunchulia, Acting Director of Department for Scientific and Technical Supervision of Operation of Buildings and Structures in the Extreme North
D. G. Shmelev, Director of Center for Monitoring of Buildings and Structures, Candidate of Geographical Sciences

Abstract

In the Norilsk industrial region, the revealed general rise in the average air temperature reaches 0.6 °C within the decade. This leads to degradation of permafrost and poses threat of accidents to the available infrastructure in the region. Negligence in this respect leads to worse safety of operation of buildings and structures, brings high economic costs connected with reconstruction, and menaces the sustainable development in the operating area of the Company. Aimed to handle the problem, from 2020 and to date, Nornickel puts a wide range of effort to maintenance of safe operation of buildings and structures built on permafrost. An innovative system of technical monitoring of buildings and structures is developed and introduced. The technical monitoring system used both conventional techniques (visual inspection, instrumental measurements) and automated technologies, with data flow in real time to a united information and diagnosis system. This allowed minimization of risks connected with accidents due to thawing of permafrost under foundations. Using the monitoring data on climate changes in the region, the mathematical models were developed for some Company’s facilities. The models enable advanced assessment of foundation ground stability and early engineering precautions toward foundation safety. Furthermore, jointly with the Polar State University, a concept is developed for the baselinepermafrost  monitoring, with making of deep thermometric holes and with restoration of historic wells. Greenhouse gas emission was determined within different landscape areas. The estimate of influence of climate on thermal conditions of permafrost used the actual monitoring data and the mathematical modeling results.

keywords Permafrost ground, climate changes, Norilsk industrial region, permafrost monitoring, geotechnical monitoring, geocryology
References

1. SP 115.13330.2016. Geophysics of hazardous natural effects (SNiP 22-01-95). Moscow : Standartinform, 2018. 36 p.
2. Kotov P. Investigations of permafrost at the modern stage. Vestnik inzhenernykh izyskaniy. 2020. No. 8(47). pp. 10–14.
3. Pö rtner H.-O., Roberts D. C., Masson-Delmotte V. (Eds.). The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate : Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2022. 755 p.
4. Hjort J., Streletskiy D., Doré G., Wu Q., Bjella K. et al. Impacts of permafrost degradation on infrastructure. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022. Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 24–38.
5. Shiklomanov N. I., Streletskiy D. A., Grebenets V. I., Luis S. Conquering the permafrost: Urban infrastructure development in Norilsk, Russia. Polar Geography. 2017. Vol. 40, Iss. 4. pp. 273–290.

6. Kotov P. I., Khilimonyuk V. Z. Building stability on permafrost in Vorkuta, Russia. Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 67–74.
7. Grebenets V. I., Streletskiy D., Shiklomanov N. Geotechnical safety issues in the cities of polar regions. Geography, Environment, Sustainability. 2012. Vol. 3, No. 5. pp. 104–119.
8. Streletskiy D. A., Shiklomanov N. I., Grebenets V. I. Changes of foundation bearing capacity due to climate warming in Northwest Siberia. Earth’s Cryosphere. 2012. Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 22–32.
9. Langer M., Von Deimling T. S., Westermann S., Rolph R., Rutte R. et al. Thawing permafrost poses environmental threat to th ousands of sites with legacy industrial contamination. Nature Communications. 2023. Vol. 14. DOI: 10.1038/s41467–023–37276–4
10. Glomsrød S., Duhaime G., Aslaksen I. (Eds.). ECONOR 2020: The Economy of the North : Final Report. Arctic Council Secretariat, 2021. 204 p.
11. Gädeke A., Langer M., Boike J., Burke E. J., Chang J. et al. Climate change reduces winter overland travel across the Pan-Arctic even under low-end global warming scenarios. Environmental Research Letters. 2021. Vol. 16, No. 2. DOI: 10.1088/1748–9326/abdcf2
12. Melnikov V. P., Osipov V. I., Brushkov A. V., Badina S. V., Drozdov D. S. et al. Damage assessment for residential and industrial buildings and structures due to temperatures change and permafrost thawing in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation by mid-XXI century. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2021. No. 1. pp. 14–31.
13. Melnikov V. P., Osipov V. I., Brouchkov A. V., Falaleeva A. A., Badina S. V. et al. Climate warming and permafrost thaw in the Russian Arctic: Potential economic impacts on public infrastructure by 2050. Natural Hazards. 2022. Vol. 112, Iss. 1. pp. 231–251.
14. Suter L., Streletskiy D., Shiklomanov N. Assessment of the cost of climate change impacts on critical infrastructure in the circumpolar Arctic. Polar Geography. 2019. Vol. 42, Iss. 4. pp. 267–286.
15. Streletskiy D. A., Clemens S., Lanckman J.-P., Shiklomanov N. I. The costs of Arctic infrastructure damages due to permafrost degradation. Environmental Research Letters. 2023. Vol. 18, No. 1. ID 015006.
16. Melvin A. M., Larsen P., Boehlert B., Neumann J. E., Chinowsky P. et al. Climate change damages to Alaska public infrastructure and the economics of proactive adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017. Vol. 114, No. 2. pp. 122–131.
17. Brushkov A. V., Alekseev A. G., Badina S. V., Drozdov D. S., Dubrovin V. A. et al. Structure maintenance experience and the need to control the soils thermal regime in permafrost areas. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023. Vol. 263. pp. 742–756.
18. Brushkov A. V., Drozdov D. S., Dubrovin V. A., Zheleznyak M. N., Osokin A. B. et al. Structure and parameters geocryological monitoring. Nauchnyi vestnik Arktiki. 2022. No. 12. pp. 78–88.
19. SP 25.13330.2020. Soil bases and foundations on permafrost soils (SNiP 2.02.04-88). Moscow : Minstroy Rossii, 2020. 141 p.
20. Kazantsev V. S., Krivenok L. A., Cherbunina M. Yu., Kotov P. I. Greenhouse gas emissions from natural ecosystems of the Norilsk industrial district. Arktika i Antarktika. 2023. No. 4. pp. 19–41.
21. Kotov P. I., Pryamitskiy A. V., Kunchuliya G. M. Dynamics of permafrost temperature regime in deep boreholes in the central part of Norilsk. Earth’s Cryosphere. 2025. Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 3–13.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back