ArticleName |
Additional professional education of high-demand personnel for coal mining: key components of adaptive organization-and-pedagogy system |
ArticleAuthorData |
Yurga Technological Institute (Division), National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Yurga, Russia:
Politsinskaya E. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences Lizunkov V. G., Associate Professor, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, vladeslave@rambler.ru |
Abstract |
The article describes the key tools of training the high-demand personnel for the coal industry within the system of additional professional education. The proposed tools of the high-demand personnel training include the legal, managerial and pedagogical mechanisms, as well as the public–private partnership in the additional professional education. These tools represent the key components of the adaptive system of organizational structure and pedagogy in the high-demand personnel training in the framework of the additional professional education. The authors report the results of the proposed system application.
The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 23–28–00046, https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-00046/. |
References |
1. Tsibizova E. B. Additional education: Purpose, content, problems program development. Narodnoye obrazovanie. 2020. No. 1(1478). pp. 129–135. 2. Gordeev M. A. Factors of improving the management model of additional professional education. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019. Vol. 9–2. pp. 36–41. 3. Davis E. R., Wilson R. “Not so globalized”: Contrasting media discourses on education and competitiveness in four countries. Journal of Asia Business Studies. 2019. Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 155–176. 4. Llopis F., Guerrero F. G. Introducing competitiveness and industry involvement as learning tools. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON. 2018. pp. 298–307. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363243 5. Winzar H., Baumann C., Chu W. Competitiveness vis-à-vis motivation and personality as drivers of academic performance: Introducing the MCP model. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2018. Vol. 32, Iss. 1. pp. 637–660. 6. Petkov V. A., Filonenko V. A. Mechanisms of social mobility operation in university educational space. Theory and practice of social development. 2014. No. 12. pp. 55–57 7. Klucharev G. A. On the training of engineers for high-tech industries. Employers’ view. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2020. No. 3. pp. 51–59. 8. Mikerovа G. Z., Zhuk A. S. Algorithm of creation of the individual educational trajectory of training. Sovremennye naukoemkie technologii. 2016. No. 11–1. pp. 138–142. 9. Chupriyanova O. M. Model for designing individual educational routes for young teachers in additional education. Higher education today. 2021. No. 5. pp. 36–40. 10. Chertischeva E. A. Additional professional education : State-of-the-art. Molodoi ucheniy. 2020. No. 26(316). pp. 323–324. 11. Woit C., Yuksel N., Charrois T. L. Pharmacy and medical students’ competence and confidence with prescribing: A cross-sectional study. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2020. Vol. 12, Iss. 11. pp. 1311–1319. 12. Sankaranarayanan S., Kandimalla S. R., Cao M., Sakr M., Penstein Rose C. et al. Designing for learning during collaborative projects online: tools and takeaways. Information and Learning Science. 2020. Vol. 121, No. (7–8). pp. 569–577. 13. Shegai N. A. The specifics of project-based learning at the university based on SCRUM. Pedagogicheskiy zhurnal. 2021. Vol. 11, No. 5(1). pp. 544–554. |