Journals →  Eurasian mining →  2022 →  #2 →  Back

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ArticleName Models of environmental safety monitoring in the management of production processes in quarries
DOI 10.17580/em.2022.02.19
ArticleAuthor Deryabin S. A., Misineva E. V., Agabubaev A. T., Rzazade U. A.
ArticleAuthorData

National University of Science and Technology—NUST MISIS, Moscow, Russia:

Deryabin S. A., Head of the ACS Department Laboratory, deryabin.sa@misis.ru
Misineva E. V., Assistant of the ACS Department
Agabubaev A. T., Head teacher of the ACS Department
Rzazade U. A., Head teacher of the ACS Department

Abstract

Currently, the data obtained during the operation of mining enterprises are not sufficiently used to assess the pollution of the natural environment. In this regard, the purpose of this work is to improve the environmental safety of the functioning of mining enterprises by developing structural and functional schemes for the modernization of technological work management processes and integrating tools for assessing the dynamics of environmental conditions based on hybrid simulation methods and Industry 4.0 technologies. Within the framework of the work done, a structural and functional model of modernization of the technological process control scheme of open-type mining enterprises for dynamic assessment of the environmental condition of polluted territories was proposed, and a software implementation of the application was also implemented, which allows integrating the obtained results into the current information environment of mining enterprises.

keywords Hybrid simulation, environmental modeling, multi-agent approach, environmental safety, mining, digital transformation, Industry 4.0
References

1. Bazarova S. B. Impact of mining on the ecosystem of the region and the assessment of the effectiveness of their environmental performance. Regional economics and management: electronic scientific journal. 2007. No. 2(10). pp. 60–70.
2. Golik V., Dmytrak Yu., Gabaraev O., Kozhiev K. Minimizing the Impact of Mining on the Environment. Ecology and Industry of Russia. Vol. 22, No. 6. 2018. pp. 26–29.
3. Tolvanen A., Eilu P., Juutinen A. et al. Mining in the Arctic environment – A review from ecological, socioeconomic and legal perspectives. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019. Vol. 233. pp. 832–844.
4. Sander R., Pan Z., Connell L. D. Laboratory measurement of low permeability unconventional gas reservoir rocks: a review of experimental methods. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2017. Vol. 37. pp. 248–279.
5. Khayrutdinov M. M, Kongar-syuryun Ch. B., Tyulyaeva Yu. S., Khayrutdinov A. M. cementless backfill mixtures based on water-soluble manmade waste. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo assets engineering. 2020. Vol. 331, No. 11. pp. 30–36.
6. Chernyshova Y. S., Savelyev B. I., Solodov S. V., Pronichkin S. V. Applying distributed ledger technologies in megacities to face anthropogenic burden challenges. IOP Conference. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022. Vol. 1069(1). 012028.
7. Rybak J., Adigamov A., Kongar-syuryun C., Khayrutdinov M., Tyulyaeva Y. Renewable-resource technologies in mining and metallurgical enterprises providing environmental safety. Minerals. 2021. Vol. 11, No. 10. 1145.
8. Trubetskoy K. N., Galchenko Y. P., Sabyanin G. V. Ecological evaluation of the production-induced change in the lithosphere. Journal of Mining Science. 2014. Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 379–384.
9. Domingues Maria S. Q., Baptista Adelina L. F., Diogo Miguel Tato. Engineering complex systems applied to risk management in the mining industry. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 27, Iss. 4. pp. 611–616.
10. Patil G. P., Balbus J., Biging G. et al. Multiscale advanced raster map analysis system: Definition, design and development. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2004. Vol. 11. pp. 113–138.
11. Ruchkin V. N., Kolesenkov A. N., Kostrov B. V., Ruchkina E. V. Algorithms of fire seat detection, modelling their dynamics and observation of forest fires via communication technologies. 4th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO 2015). Montenegro : IEEE, 2015. pp. 254–257.
12. Solodov S. V., Mamai I. B., Pronichkin S. V. Framing regional innovation and technology policies for transformative change. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022. Vol. 981. 022007.
13. Khokhryakov A. V., Larionova I. V., Moskvina O. A., Tseytlin E. M. A system approach to environmental safety management in mining. GIAB. 2020. No. 3-1. pp. 501–517.
14. Korchagina T. V., Stepanov Yu. A., Burmin L. N. Method of environmental impact indicators assessment within coal enterprises footprint. Ugol. No. 8(1109). 2018. pp. 119–123.
15. Skorobogatov A. G., Ferezanova M.V., Mandych V. G., Sherbakov A. A. Modeling the transfer of toxic substances in water bodies. Rossijskij himicheskij zhurnal. 2007. Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 74–76.
16. Deryabin S. A., Misineva E. V. Hybrid simulation modeling of ecological state of a mining region using a multi-agent approach. GIAB. 2022. No. 4. pp. 169–181.
17. Temkin I. O., Myaskov A. V., Konov I. S., Deryabin S. A. Construction and functioning of digital platform for transportation control in opencast mines. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2019. No. 11. pp. 82–86. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2019.11.15
18. Deryabin S. A., Kondratev E. I., Rzazade Ulvi Azar Ogly, Temkin I. O. Digital mine architecture modeling language: methodological approach to design in industry 4.0. GIAB. 2022. No. 2. pp. 97–110.
19. Savelyev B. I., Solodov S. V., Tropin D. V. Formalizing and securing relationships on multi-task metric learning for IoT-based smart cities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. Vol. 2094. 032062.

Full content Models of environmental safety monitoring in the management of production processes in quarries
Back