National University of Science and Technology MISiS, Moscow, Russia:

N. A. Belov, Professor at the Department of Metal Forming, Doctor of Technical Sciences, e-mail: nikolay-belov@yandex.ru
N. O. Korotkova, Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Hybrid Nanostructured Materials
V. V. Doroshenko, Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Catalysis and Hydrocarbon Processing
A. A. Aksenov, Professor at the Department of Metal Forming

The authors used experimental and modelling techniques to look at the specific electrical resistance and phase composition of low-alloy Al – Ca – Mn alloys after they had been subjected to various annealing regimes. The study focused on four alloys in the form of ingots and cold-rolled sheets containing 1.5% Mn and up to 1% Ca. Templates cut out of ingots and sheets were annealed in a muffle furnace using multi-stage modes in the temperature range of 300 to 600 ^oC. They were soaked for 3 hours at each stage of the process and air cooled after each stage. It was found that, in the as-cast state, all manganese in all four alloys makes a part of the aluminium solution (Al), whereas calcium is comprised in the (Al) + Al₄Ca eutectic, which agrees with the Sheil-Gulliver non-equilibrium solidification simulation. Annealing of cold-rolled sheets for 3 hours at 600 ^oC results in an equilibrium phase composition and a uniform structure – i. e. globular submicron particles evenly distributed throughout the aluminium matrix. In their initial state, when almost all Mn is comprised in (Al), the ingots and coldrolled sheets of all the studied alloys have little to no difference between each other in terms of specific electrical resistance. On the other hand, Ca helps to significantly lower the specific resistance (by 6 μΩ·mm) compared with the base alloy after cold-rolled sheets have been annealed at 350–400 ^oC. It may be attributed to a higher rate of aluminium solution breakdown, which is associated with a dropping concentration of Mn in (Al) and Al10CaMn2 particles forming in line with the Al – Ca – Mn phase diagram.
This research was funded under Grant of the Russian Science Foundation N 20-19-00746.

1. Hatch J. E. Aluminum: properties and physical metallurgy. Ohio : ASM Metals Park, 1984. 424 p.
2. International alloy designations and chemical composition limits for wrought aluminum and wrought aluminum alloys. The Aluminum Association Publications. Arlington. Available at: https://www.aluminum.org/sites/default/files/2021-10/Teal%20Sheet.pdf (Accessed: 04.08.2022).
3. Li Y. J., Arnberg L. Quantitative study on the precipitation behavior of dispersoids in DC-cast AA3003 alloy during heating and homogenization. Acta Materialia. 2003. Vol. 51. pp. 3415–3428. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00160-5.
4. Flattum Muggerud A. M., Li Ya., Holmestad R. Orientation studies of α-Al(Fe,Mn)Si dispersoids in 3xxx Al alloys. Materials Science Forum. 2014. Vol. 794–796. pp. 39–44. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.794-796.39.
5. Robson J. D., Hill T., Kamp N. The effect of hot deformation on dispersoid evolution in a model 3xxx alloy. Materials Science Forum. 2014. Vol. 794–796. pp. 697–703. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.794-796.697.
6. Rios P. R., Fonseca G. S. Grain boundary pinning by Al6Mn precipitates in an Al – 1wt%Mn alloy. Scripta Materialia. 2004. Vol. 50, Iss. 1. pp. 71–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.031.
7. Mondolfo L. F. Aluminum Alloys: Structure and Properties. Translated from English. Moscow : Metallurgiya, 1979. 640 p.
8. Belov N. A., Korotkova N. O., Cherkasov S. O., Aksenov A. A. Electrical conductivity and hardness of Al – 1.5% Mn and Al – 1.5% Mn – 1.5% Cu (wt.%) cold-rolled sheets: Comparative analysis. Tsvetnye Metally. 2020. No. 4. pp. 52–58. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2020.04.08.
9. Belov N., Korotkova N., Akopyan T., Tsydenov K. Simultaneous increase of electrical conductivity and hardness of Al – 1.5 wt% Mn alloy by addition of 1.5 wt.% Cu and 0.5 wt.% Zr. Metals. 2019. Vol. 9. p. 1246. DOI: 10.3390/met9121246.
10. Naumova E. A. Use of calcium in alloys: From modifying to alloying. Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals. 2018. Vol. 59, No. 3. pp. 284–298. DOI: 10.3103/S1067821218030100.
11. Belov N. A., Naumova E. A., Akopyan T. K., Doroshenko V. V. Design of multicomponent aluminium alloy containing 2 wt.% Ca and 0.1 wt.% Sc for wrought and cast products. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018. Vol. 762. pp. 528–536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.281.
12. Belov N. A., Batyshev K. I., Doroshenko V. V. Microstructure and phase composition of the eutectic Al – Ca alloy, additionally alloyed with small additives of zirconium, scandium and manganese. Non-Ferrous Metals. 2017. No. 2. pp. 44–49. DOI: 10.17580/nfm.2017.02.09.
13. Naumova E. A., Doroshenko V. V., Barykin M. A., Sviridova T. A., Lyasnikova A. V. et al. Hypereutectic Al – Ca – Mn – (Ni) alloys as natural eutectic composites. Metals. 2021. No. 11. p. 890. DOI: 10.3390/met11060890.
14. GOST 11069–2001. Primary aluminium. Grades. Introduced: 01.01.2003. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2001.
15. GOST 53777–2010. Master alloys of aluminium. Specifications. Introduced: 01.07.2010. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2010.
16. Thermo-Calc Software TTAL5 Al-alloys. Available at: www.thermocalc.com (Accessed: 17.02.2021).
17. Belov N. A. Phase diagrams of tertiary and quaternary systems: A guide for university students. Moscow : NITU “MISiS”, 2007. 360 p.
18. Vlach M., Stulikova I., Smola B., Piesova J., Cisarova H. et al. Effect of cold rolling on precipitation processes in Al – Mn – Sc – Zr alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2012. Vol. 548. pp. 27–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.063.
19. Chen S. P., Kuijpers N. C. W., van der Zwaag S. Effect of microsegregation and dislocations on the nucleation kinetics of precipitation in aluminium alloy AA3003. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2003. No. 341. pp. 296–306. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00245-9.
20. Zhao Q., Zhang H., Qiu F., Jiang Q. C. Strain-induced precipitation kinetics during non-isothermal annealing of Al – Mn alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018. Vol. 735. pp. 2275–2280. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.360.