ArticleName |
Influence of magnetic-abrasive processing on roughness
of flat products made of AMts grade aluminum alloy |
ArticleAuthorData |
Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russia:
V. V. Maksarov, Professor, Head of the Chair for Mechanical Engineering, Dean of the faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Doctor of Technical Sciences, e-mail: maks78.54@mail.ru A. I. Keksin, Associate Professor, Chair for Mechanical Engineering, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: keksin.a@mail.ru I. A. Filipenko, Postgraduate Student, Chair for Mechanical Engineering, e-mail: f.ira94@list.ru |
Abstract |
The widespread use of AMts grade aluminum alloy in industry is due to its physical and mechanical properties and high weldability. For most products, high requirements are placed on surface roughness, including the surface of the edges of products subjected to special preparation before welding to ensure a high-quality welded joint. However, achieving the required roughness values is technologically quite laborious. As a finishing method of processing in order to ensure a given value of roughness, the method of magnetic-abrasive processing (MAP) is widely used, which makes it possible to significantly reduce the surface roughness. However, the dependence of the process of forming the surface roughness of products made of the AMts grade aluminum alloy on technological parameters of processing has not been previously established. In this regard, the article presents the results of experimental studies of the influence of MAP factors (the value of magnetic induction B, T; processing time t, min; workpiece rotation frequency n, min–1; workpiece feed along the pole pieces S, mm/min) on the formation surface roughness (Ra) of flat products made of AMts grade aluminum alloy. Based on the research results, polynomial functions have been compiled that enable to estimate the degree of influence of each processing parameter on surface roughness, as well as to determine the rational values of these parameters necessary to achieve its required level. The selected rational values make it possible to form the surface roughness of pro ducts made of AMts grade aluminum alloy in the range of Ra = 0.23÷0.31 μm, which is 6 times lower than the original one. A mathematical model has been created for the formation of surface roughness depending on the processing parameters, which makes it possible to comprehensively assess the effect of these parameters on the process. The model confirms the conclusion made on the basis of the analysis of polynomial functions and shows that the greatest influence on the formation of surface roughness is exerted by the feed rate of the workpiece along the pole-pieces and the magnitude of the magnetic induction. |
References |
1. Thijs L., Kempen K., Kruth J.-P., Van-Humbeeck J. Fine structured aluminium products with controllable texture by selective laser melting of pre-alloyed AlSi10Mg powder. Acta Mater. 2013. Vol. 61, Iss. 5. pp. 1809–1819. 2. Han Q., Setchi R., Evans S. L. Characterisation and milling time optimisation of nanocrystalline aluminium powder for selective laser melting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2017. No. 88. pp. 1429–1438. 3. Song D., Zhou J., Wang K. et al. Experiment investigation on machining characteristics of 7075 aluminium alloy with short electric arc milling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2021. No. 117. pp. 863–876. 4. Ivanov S. L., Ivanova P. V., Kuvshinkin S. Yu. Evaluation of working time for quarry excavators of the prospective vehicle line in the real operating conditions. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020. No. 242. pp. 228–233. DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2020.2.228. 5. Mikhailov A. V., Fedorov A. S. Aanalysis of parameters of a screw press die for 3D extrusion of tubular-type peat pieces. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. No. 249. pp. 351–365. DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2021.3.4.
6. Yungmeister D. A., Lavrenko S. A., Yacheikin A. I., Urazbakhtin R. Y. Improving the shield machine cutter head for tunneling under the conditions of the Metrostroy Saint Petersburg mines. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2020. Vol. 11. 15. pp. 1282–1288. 7. Komolov V., Belikov A., Demenkov P. Research on load-bearing constructions behavior during pit excavation under “Slurry wall” protection. Lecture notes in civil engineering. 2022. Vol. 180. pp. 313–323. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83917-8_29. 8. Palyanitsina A., Safiullina E., Byazrov R., Podoprigora D., Alekseenko A. Environmentally safe technology to increase efficiency of high-viscosity oil production for the objects with advanced water cut. Energies. 2022. Vol. 15(3), 753. DOI: 10.3390/en15030753. 9. Beloglazov I.I., Petrov P.A., Bazhin V.Yu. The concept of digital twins for tech operator training simulator design for mining and processing industry. Eurasian Mining. 2020. Vol. 2. pp. 50–54. DOI: 10.17580/em.2020.02.12. 10. Nikolaev A.K., Zaripova N.А. Substantiation of analytical dependences for hydraulic calculation of high-viscosity oil transportation. Journal of Mining Institute. 2021. Vol. 252. pp. 885–895. 11. Litvinenko V. S., Dvoynikov M. V., Trushko V. L. Elaboration of a conceptual solution for the development of the Arctic shelf from seasonally flooded coastal areas. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2022. Vol. 32, Iss. 1. pp. 113–119. 12. Litvinenko V. S., Dvoinikov M. V. The technique for determination of drilling procedure parameters of inclined and straight hole sections using a downhole screw motors. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020. No. 241. pp. 105–112. DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2020.1.105. 13. Shishlyannikov D. I., Zverev V. Yu., Muravsky A. K., Zvonarev I. E., Korolyov I. A. Procedure to determine weighted average capacity of machine chains in potash mines. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin. 2021. Vol. 7. pp. 125–133. DOI: 10.25018/0236_1493_2021_7_0_125. 14. Grigoryev М. V., Oglodkov М. S. Effect of machining on mechanical and fatigue properties of 1441 and B-1481 aluminum-lithium alloy sheets. Trudy VIAM. 2018. No. 4(64). pp. 20–27. 15. Drits А. М., Ovchinnikov V. V. Welding of aluminum alloys. Moscow : Ruda i Metally, 2020. 476 p. 16. Vasilyev A. S., Goncharov A. A. Special processing strategy for conic screw surfaces with complicated shape in working mechanisms of a singlescrew compressor. Journal of Mining Institute. 2019. No. 235. pp. 60–64. DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2019.1.60. 17. Khomich N. S. Magnetic-abrasive processing of articles : monograph. Minsk : BNTU, 2006. 218 p. 18. Maksarov V. V., Keksin А. I. Technological improvement of the quality of complex-profile surfaces by magnetic-abrasive polishing. Metalloobrabotka. 2017. Vol. 97. pp. 47–57. 19. Sakulevich F. Yu. Fundamentals of magnetic-abrasive processing. Minsk : Nauka i tekhnika, 1981. 328 p. 20. Gupta B., Jain A., Purohit R., Rana R. S., Gupta B. Effects of process parameters on the surface finish of flat surfaces in magnetic assist abrasive finishing process. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2018. No. 5. pp. 17725–17729. 21. Girma B., Joshi S. S., Raghuram M. V. G. S., Balasubramaniam R. An experimental analysis of magnetic abrasives finishing of plane surfaces. Machining Science and Technology. 2006. No. 10. pp. 323–340. 22. Li W., Li X., Yang S., Li W. A newly developed media for magnetic abrasive finishing process: material removal behavior and finishing performance. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2018. No. 260. pp. 20–29. 23. Anjaneyulu K., Venkatesh G. Surface texture improvement of magnetic and nonmagnetic materials using magnetic abrasive finishing process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2020. Vol. 235. pp. 4084–4096. 24. Davis J. R. Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. ASM International. 1993. 784 p. 25. Baron Yu. М. Magnetic-abrasive and magnetic processing of articles and cutting tools. Leningrad : Mashinostroenie, 1986. 176 p. 26. Novik F. S., Arsov Ya. B. Optimization of metal technology processes by methods of experiments planning. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 1980. 304 p. |