ArticleName |
Lithology and geochemical characterization of low-permeability shale strata: A-case-study of Khadum Formation in Ciscaucasia |
ArticleAuthorData |
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting, Moscow, Russia:
V. Yu. Kerimov, Head of Department, Chief Researcher, Professor, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, vagif.kerimov@mail.ru R. N. Mustaev, Acting Prorector of Science, Associate Professor, Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences |
References |
1. Vassoevich N. B., Neruchev S. G. Main development stages and diagnostics of productive strata. Oil Source Beds and Diagnostics Concept : Workshop Proceedings. Moscow : Nauka, 1979. pp. 15–29. 2. Bazhenova O. K., Burlin Yu. K., Sokolov B. A., Khain V. E. Geology and geochemistry of oil and gas : textbook. Moscow : Izdatelstvo MGU, 2000. 384 p. 3. Batalin O. Yu., Vafina N. G. Forms of free-hydrocarbon capture by kerogen. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamentalnykh issledovaniy. 2013. No. 10-3. pp. 418–425. 4. Tissot B. P., Welte D. H. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence. 2nd revised and enlarged edition. Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 1984. 699 s. 5. Kalmykov A. G., Karpov Yu. A., Topchiy M. S., Fomina M. M., Manuilova E. A. et al. The effect of catagenetic maturity on the formation of reservoirs with organic porosity in the Bazhenov formation and peculiarities of their extension. Georesources. 2019. Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 159–171. 6. Dakhnova M. V., Mozhegova S. V., Nazarova E. S., Payzanskaya I. L. Evaluation of reserves of shale oil using geochemical parameters. Geologiya nefti i gaza. 2015. No. 4. pp. 55–61. 7. Prischepa O. M., Averyanova O. Yu. Contributions to the terminology of hydrocarbons bearing shale formations – unconventional sources of oil and gas. Neftegazovaya geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 2013. Vol. 8, No. 3. DOI: 10.17353/2070-5379/27_2013 8. Dmitrievskiy A. N., Skibitskaya N. A. Matrix oil : Prospects for new knowledge space exploration. Oil & Gas Journal Russia. 2011. No. 9. pp. 70–74. 9. Kerimov V. Yu., Mustaev R. N., Bondarev A. V. Evaluation of the Organic Carbon Content in the Low-Permeability Shale Formations (As in the Case of the Khadum Suite in the Ciscaucasia Region). Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2016. Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 3235–3241. 10. Kerimov V. Yu., Lapidus A. L., Yandarbiev N. Sh., Movsumzade E. M., Mustaev R. N. Physicochemical Properties of Shale Strata in the Maikop Series of Ciscaucasia. Solid Fuel Chemistry. 2017. Vol. 51, No. 2. pp. 122–130. 11. Lapidus A. L., Kerimov V. Yu., Mustaev R. N., Movsumzade E. M., Zakharchenko M. V. Caucasus Maykopian kerogenous shale sequences: Generative potential. Oil Shale. 2018. Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 113–127. 12. Washburn A. M., Hudson S. M., Selby D., Abdullayev N., Shiyanova N. Constraining the timing and depositional conditions of the Maikop formation within the Kura basin, Eastern Azerbaijan, through the application of Re-Os geochronology and chemostratigraphy. Journal of Petroleum Geology. 2019. Vol. 42, Iss. 3. pp. 281–300. 13. Kudin E. V. Description of geological structure and displays clay petroleum reservoir formation Khadum Praskoveisky-Achikulak shaft East Ciscaucasia. Innovation in Science : XXI International Virtual Conference Proceedings. Novosibirsk : SibAK, 2013. pp. 63–77. 14. Morariu D., Averyanova O. Yu. Some aspects of oil shale – finding kerogen to generate oil. Neftegazovaya geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 2013. Vol. 8, No. 1. DOI: 10.17353/2070-5379/3_2013 15. Yandarbiev N. Sh., Fadeeva N. P., Kozlova E. V., Naumchev Yu. V. Khadum formation of Pre-Caucasus region as potential source of oil shales: geology and geochemistry. Georesources. 2017. Special issue. pp. 208–226. 16. Kerimov V. Y., Mustaev R. N., Osipov A. V. Peculiarities of Hydrocarbon Generation at Great Depths in the Crust. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2018. Vol. 483(1) pp. 1413–1417. 17. Guliev I. S., Kerimov V. Yu., Mustaev R. N., Bondarev A. V. The estimation of the generation potential of the low permeable shale strata of the maikop caucasian series. SOCAR Proceedings. 2018. No. 1. pp. 4–20. 18. Qing Li, Zaixing Jiang, Xuelian You, Chao Han. A methodology for estimating the organic porosity of the source rocks at the mature stage: example from the marlstone in the Shulu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2016. Vol. 9, Iss. 6. 428. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-016-2461-3 19. Loucks R. G., Reed R. M., Ruppel S. C., Hammes U. Preliminary Classification of Matrix Pores in Mudrocks. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions. 2010. Vol. 60. pp. 435–441. 20. Modica C. J., Lapierre S. G. Estimation of kerogen porosity in source rocks as a function of thermal transformation: Example from the Mowry Shale in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming. AAPG Bulletin. 2012. Vol. 96, No. 1. pp. 87–108. 21. Pepper A. S., Corvi P. J. Simple kinetic models of petroleum formation. Part I: Oil and gas generation from kerogen. Marine and Petroleum Geology. 1995. Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 291–319. 22. Mustaev R. N., Kerimov V. Y., Shilov G. Y., Dmitrievsky S. S. Modeling of thermobaric conditions formation of the shale hydrocarbon accumulations in low-permeability reservoirs khadum formation ciscaucasia. Geomodel 2016 – 18th Science and Applied Research Conference on Oil and Gas Geological Exploration and Development. 2016. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201602185 23. Kerimov V., Rachinsky M., Mustaev R., Serikova U. Geothermal conditions of hydrocarbon formation in the South Caspian basin. Iranian Journal of Earth Sciences. 2018. Vol. 10. pp. 78–89. |