| ArticleName |
Static wetting angles of water and sulphur at the zinc sulphide surface modified with anionic surfactants and their combinations |
| ArticleAuthorData |
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia:
E. B. Kolmachikhina, Associate Professor, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: e.b.khazieva@urfu.ru
T. N. Lugovitskaya, Associate Professor, Candidate of Technical Sciences
K. D. Naumov, Lecturer, Candidate of Technical Sciences |
| Abstract |
This paper looks at the effect produced by surface modification of the super pure zinc sulphide monocrystals with certain surfactants and their combinations (sodium lignosulphonate (SLS), sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), sodium dodecylbenzenesulphonate (SDBS) and the following combinations: SLS + SDS, SLS + SDBS on the surface angle of wetting with water and elemental sulphur melt. It was found that as the concentration of individual surfactants in the solution rose, so did the wetting ability of the mineral surface. Thus, at the surfactant concentration of 0.8 g/dm3 the water wetting angle reaches 48.4o for SLS, 22.5o for SDS and 10.3o for SDBS; the elemental sulphur wetting angle is 71.3o for SLS, 76.9o for SDS and 67.9o for SDBS. The work of adhesion in the system ZnS – Surfactant – Н2О increases by 9–11%, and in the system ZnS – Surfactant – S0 — by 5–8%. When using the combinations SLS + SDS (СSLS = 0.2–0.8 g/dm3) and SLS + SDBS (СSLS = 0.2 g/dm3), inverse surface wetting of zinc sulphide with elemental sulphur melt is observed. The maximum wetting angles reached are 93o and 85o, correspondingly. The work of adhesion and the spreading coefficient expectedly decrease. The paper analyzes the effect of individual surfactants and their combinations on the pressure leaching of zinc sulphide concentrate. The use of individual surfactants intensifies the transition of valuable components into the solution. The biggest increase in recovery was seen when using SLS, and namely 27–32% for zinc and 11–16% for copper. The recovery of zinc increased by 31–41% in the presence of SLS + SDS and by 27–34% in the presence of SLS + SDBS.
This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 18-19-00186. |
| References |
1. Xu B., Zhong H., Jiang T. An investigation of oxygen pressure acid leaching of Gacun complex Cu-Pb bulk concentrate. Rare Metals. 2012. Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 96–101.
2. Elfimova L. G., Karimov K. A., Kritskii A. V., Naboychenko S. S. Pressure leaching of copper-nickel converter matte in sulfuric acid media. Tsvetnye Metally. 2018. No. 10. pp. 24–28. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2018.10.04.
3. Karimov K. A., Rogozhnikov D. A., Naboichenko S. S., Karimova L. M., Zakharyan S. V. Autoclave ammonia leaching of silver from low-grade copper concentrates. Metallurgist. 2018. Vol. 62, No. 7-8. pp. 783–789.
4. Petrov G. V., Boduen A. Ya., Ivanov B. S., Serebryakov M. A. Investigation of ammonia autoclave leaching of silver and rhenium containing ill-condi tioned copper concentrate. Tsvetnye Metally. 2016. No. 10. pp. 23–28. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2016.10.03.
5. Zhukov V. V., Laari A., Lampinen M., Koiranen T. A mechanistic kinetic model for direct pressure leaching of iron containing sphalerite concentrate. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2017. Vol. 118. pp. 131–141.
6. Owusu G., Dreisinger D. B., Peters E. Effect of surfactants on zinc and iron dissolution rates during oxidative leaching of sphalerite. Hydrometallurgy. 1995. Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 315–324.
7. Halfyard J. E., Hawboldt K. Separation of elemental sulfur from hydrometallurgical residue: A review. Hydrometallurgy. 2011. Vol. 109. pp. 80–89.
8. Suárez-Gómez S. L., Sánchez M. L., Blanco F., Ayala J., de Cos Juez F. J. Successful sulfur recovery in low sulfurate compounds obtained from the zinc industry: Evaporation-condensation method. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2017. Vol. 336. pp. 168–173.
9. Jorjani E., Ghahreman A. Challenges with elemental sulfur removal during the leaching of copper and zinc sulfides, and from the residues; a review. Hydrometallurgy. 2017. Vol. 171. pp. 333–343.
10. Piskunov V. M., Reznichenko V. V. On the influence of lignosulphonates on the removal of impurities from zinc solutions by carburization. Research papers of VNIItsvetmet. Ust-Kamenogorsk : VNIItsvetmet, 2006. pp. 56–58.
11. Kolesnikov A. V., Semenov K. V. Understanding the kinetic parameters of the electrochemical system of zinc sulphate solution in the presence of lignosulphonate. Butlerovskie soobshcheniya. 2016. Vol. 47, No. 7. pp. 70–73.
12. Lugovitskaya T. N., Naboychenko S. S. The physicochemical properties of the aqueous solutions of the binary mixtures of lignin and sodium dodecyl sulphate derivates. Zhurnal prikladnoy khimii. 2018. Vol. 91, No. 1. pp. 90–97.
13. Lugovitskaya T. N., Bolatbaev K. N., Naboichenko S. S. Study of surface phenomena at phase boundaries in the presence of lignosulfonates. Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry. 2012. Vol. 85, No. 8. pp. 1192–1196.
14. Kolmachikhina E. B., Ryzhkova E. A., Dmitrieva D. V., Vakula K. A., Mokretsov M. A. Understanding the effect of lignosulphonate, anionic surfactants and their mixtures on the zinc concentrate pressure leaching performance. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2018. Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 143–150.
15. Shneerson Ya. M., Lapin A. Yu., Shpaer V. M. Pressure leaching of offgrade sphalerite concentrates and certain process features. Tsvetnye Metally. 2004. No. 12. pp. 82–87.
16. Naftal M. N., Ertseva L. N., Naboychenko S. S. Construction and content of sulphur-sulphide phases of autoclave-oxidation leaching of nickelpyrrhotine concentrate with usage of combined surface-active agents. Tsvetnye Metally. 2012. No. 2. pp 40–46.
17. Owusu G., Dreisinger D. B. Interfacial properties determinations in liquid sulfur, aqueous zinc sulfate and zinc sulfide systems. Hydrometallurgy. 1996. Vol 43. pp. 207–218.
18. Ono K., Matsushima T. The surface tension of liquid sulfur. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1957. Vol. 9. pp. 309–318. |
