Mining Institute, Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia:

I. E. Semenova, Leading Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
S. V. Dmitriev, Junior Researcher, dsvoficialmail@mail.ru
A. A. Shestov, Leading Programmer

A rock mass is composed of blocks, and the interfaces of various scale blocks represent different kind discontinuities. Such structure is also associated with nonuniformity of stresses. The stress–strain behavior of rock mass in the Khibiny apatite–nepheline massif in the course of mining is governed by natural geological and induced faulting. This study considers modification of the finite element method in the stress–strain analysis of rocks with regard to deformation at interfaces of different-modulus media. After 2D tests of interface elements, an optimal type of the interface element was selected for the 3D modification implementation. The latter can improve reliability of geomechanical forecasts in mineral mining in complicated geological and geodynamic conditions. From the test data on modification of interface elements, the optimal interface element is assumed to be the six-node interface element proposed by V. Kalyakin and Jianchao Li. The six-node interface element is introduced in the model of a tunnel with simulation of an unloading line at the boundary. The adequate results on adjacent rock deformation are obtained. The 3D interface element modification reveals its peculiarities and limitations as regards introduction in finite element models of mineral deposits and enclosing rock mass. The ways of solving these problems are proposed.

1. Kaizong Xia, Congxin Chen, Hua Fu, Yucong Pan, Yangyang Deng. Mining-induced ground deformation in tectonic stress metal mines: A case study. Engineering Geology. 2016. Vol. 210. pp. 212–230.
2. Cheskidov V. V., Lipina A. V., Melnichenko I. A. Integrated monitoring of engineering structures in mining. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 2. pp. 18–21. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.02.05
3. Eremenko V. A., Neguritsa D. L. Efficient and active monitoring of stresses and strains in rock masses. Eurasian Mining. 2016. No. 1. pp. 21–24. DOI: 10.17580/em.2016.01.02
4. Koryakov A. E., KopylovA. B., Savin I. N. Using finite element method by modeling shifting elements of mining massif. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2017. No. 4. pp. 344–354.
5. Ferté G., Massin P., Moës N. 3D crack propagation with cohesive elements in the extended finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 2016. Vol. 300. pp. 347–374.
6. Sarakorn W. 2-D magnetotelluric modeling using finite element method incorporating unstructured quadrilateral element. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2017. Vol. 139. pp. 16–24.
7. Wei Li, Delaney T. J., Xiangmin Jiao, Samulyak R., Cao Lu. Finite Element Model for Brittle Fracture and Fragmentation. Procedia Computer Science. 2016. Vol. 80. pp. 245–256.
8. Kozyrev A. A., Semenova I. E., Shestov A. A. Numerical modeling of stresses and strains in rocks as a basis of rockburst hazard prediction at different stages of mineral mining. Computer Technologies in Mine Planning and Design : Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific Conference in Association with Foreign Scientists. Apatity – Saint-Petersburg, 2009. pp. 251–256.
9. Avetisyan I. M., Semenova I. E., Dmitriev S. V., Shestov A. A. Analysis of the principal tangential stresses and shear areas in the volumetric model of an elastically deformed rock mass. GIAB. 2017. Special issue 23. Information technologies in implementation of ecological strategy in the mining industry development. pp. 258–264.
10. Goodman R. E., Taylor R. L., Brekke T. L. A Model for the Mechanics of Jointed Rock. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division. 1968. Vol. 94. Iss. 3. pp. 637–659.
11. Lamonina E. V. Numerical modeling of jointed rock masses : thesis of inauguration of Dissertation … of Candidate of Engineering Sciences. Moscow, 2006. 164 p.
12. Kostyuchenko V. N., Kocharyan G. G., Pavlov D. V. Strain characteristics of interblock gaps of different scales. Fizicheskaya mezomekhanika. 2002. Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 23–42.
13. Dmitriev S. V. Choise the optimal contact element modification for stressed-strain state modeling of the rock massif with heterogeneity accounting. Sever i rynok: formirovanie ekonomicheskogo poryadka. 2019. No. 1(63). pp. 143–153.
14. Herrmann L. R. Finite element analysis of contact problems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics. 1978. Vol. 104(5). pp. 1043–1059.
15. Jianchao Li. Numerical Simulation of Interfaces in Geomaterials: Development of a New Zero-Thickness Interface Element. University of Delaware, 1993. 154 p.