Название |
Assessment of the labour-intensity of manufacturing tools amid of small batch
and piece production |
Информация об авторе |
Tula State University (Tula, Russia):
V. B. Protasyev, Dr. Eng., Prof., e-mail: avprotasev@mail.ru
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Moscow, Russia):
S. V. Yudin, Dr. Eng., Prof., e-mail: svjudin@rambler.ru |
Реферат |
It is shown that the existing methods for assessing the labourintensity of manufacturing engineering products, in particular tools designed for machining steels and alloys, are not optimal in small-scale and piece production. Based on personal experience and analysis of literature data, the authors propose to use the “signal-to-noise” criterion and loss function introduced for this purpose into scientific phrase by G. Taguchi, the Japanese quality assessment specialist. For this purpose, single-type tools or any other products are isolated and the main structural elements are revealed in them. Using the methods of qualimetry and based on an expert survey, the weight of each element is determined. A base product containing all structural elements is selected, the labor-intensiveness of which is known. Relative scores of each structural element of the manufactured product are calculated. The relative labour-intensity indicator is calculated taking into account the weights of all structural elements as the average value of the relative scores. To assess the absolute labour-intensity, the G. Taguti`s parabolic loss function is used. The authors affirm that the labour-intensity of manufacturing products can be considered as losses. A technique to determine the parabola parameter is presented. An example of calculations to determine the labour-intensity of manufacturing a spherical conic mill is considered. This example shows that the proposed method does not require specific knowledge and skills, can be easily automated. The technique can be extended to any product, including rolled products in metallurgy. A corresponding example is considered. |
Библиографический список |
1. Paley М. М. Manufacturing technology for metal-cutting tools. 2nd edition. М. : Mashinostroenie, 1982. 256 p. 2. Kwon Y., Fischer G. W. A novel approach to quantifying tool wear and tool life measurements for optimal tool management. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2003. Vol. 43, Iss. 4. pp. 359–368. DOI: 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00271-7 3. Yuan Shyi, Peter Chiua, Singa Wang Chiu. Incorporating expedited time and cost of the end product into the product structure diagram. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2005. Vol. 45, Iss. 7–8. pp. 987–991. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.10.015 4. Juan H., Yub S. F., Leeb B. Y. The optimal cutting-parameter selection of production cost in HSM for SKD61 tool steels. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2003. Vol. 43, Iss. 7. pp. 679–686. DOI: 10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00038-5 5. Chulho Chung, Qingjin Peng. The selection of tools and machines on web-based manufacturing environments. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2004. Vol. 44, Iss. 2–3. pp. 317–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.09.002 6. El-Maraghy W., El-Maraghy H., Tomiyama T., Monostori L. Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals. 2012. Vol. 61, Iss. 2. pp. 793–814. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001 7. Schuh G., Rudolf S., Riesener M., Dölle Ch., Schloesser S. Product Production Complexity Research: Developments and Opportunities. Procedia CIRP. 2017. Vol. 60. pp. 344–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.006 8. Valdez A. C., Brauner P., Schaar A. K., Holyinger A., Ziefle M. Reducing Complexity with Simplicity – Usability Methods for Industry 4.0. Proceedings of 19th Triennal Congress of the IEA (2015, Melbourne, August 9–14). pp. 1–8. 9. Istotskiy V. V.. Algorithm for graphic analytical synthesis of shaped tools with skew teeth. Chernye metally. 2019. No. 1. pp. 72–77. 10. Yamnikov A. S., Yamnikova O. A., Boriskin O. I., Troitsky D. I. Physical Modeling of Cast Iron Radiator Nipple Oppositely Directed Thread Turn Milling. CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2017. Vol. 14. pp. 40–44. 11. Kos Andrzej. Podstawy geometriczne obrobki obwiednowej. Warzawa : Widawnicmwa polotechniki warszawskiej, 1983. 99 p. 12. Quality Control, Robust Design and the Taguchi Method. Edited by K. Dehnad. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, Pacifi c Grove, 1989. 310 p. 13. Taguchi G., Chowdhury S., Wu Y. Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook. The Wiley Foundation. 2004. 1696 p. 14. Basovskiy L. E., Protasyev V. B. Quality management. A textbook. 3rd edition. М. : INFRA-M. 2018. 231 p. 15. Ostapenko S. N., Palikhov G. V., Protasyev V. B., Yudin S. V. Integration of quality management systems and automatic process control system. Vestnik vozdushno-kosmicheskoy oborony. 2019. No. 2. pp. 99–110. 16. GOST 3882–74 (ISO 513-75). Hard sintered alloys. Grades (with variations № 1–6, and with remark). — Intr. 01.01.1976. 17. GOST 4543–2016. Metal products from structural alloyed steel. Technical specifi cations. Intr. 01.10.2017. 18. Philosophy of quality by Taguchi. All about quality. Foreign experience. М. : NTK "Trek". 2000, Iss. 6. 17 p. 19. Markova G. V., Kasimtsev A. V., Volodko S. S., Bubnenkov B. B. Effect of helical rolling on the structure and properties of TiNi powder alloy. Part 1. Tsvetnye metally. 2018. No. 11. pp. 75–82. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2018.11.11 20. Belevitin V. A., Smirnov E. N., Suvorov A. V. Technology of structural materials: metal processing. A textbook. Chelyabinsk. Izd. Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2015. 184 p. 21. GOST 803–81. Hot-rolled strip for cladding made of carbon quality and high-quality steel. Technical specification (with var. No. 1). Intr. 01.01.1983. |