ArticleName |
Improvement of processing behavior of soil at the work face of tunnel boring machine using foam agents |
ArticleAuthorData |
Russian University of Transport – MIIT, Moscow, Russia
S. V. Mazein, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, maz-bubn@mail.ru
National University of Scvience and Technology – MISIS, Moscow, Russia A. S. Voznesenskiy, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences A. N. Pankratenko, Head of Chair, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
Mosinzhpproekt, Moscow, Russia E. A. Sharshova, Leading Engineer |
Abstract |
The aim of the study is the laboratory and full-scale testing of the selected materials (foam agents) for treatment of soil in shield tunneling with earth pressure support in various geological conditions within the city of Moscow in the framework of the regulatory documentation development. The article presents the lab test results on selection of additive for each type of soil and recommendations on optimal consumption of the additives, as well as the field test data on the doping agents using with tunnel boring machine with diameter of 10.82 m. In the full-scale test with the tunnel boring machine with earth pressure support, correctness of the laboratory selection of foam agents to treat soil was checked. The influence of the doping agents in the rotor torque characterizing movability of foam–soil in face was estimated using the bank of measurements of the machine power parameters and process fluid flow rates (water, air, additives). It is required to use additives in suitable geological conditions and in recommended combinations, based on the international experience. The in-situ studies into efficient reduction in the rotor torque depending on the additive consumption were carried out in the framework of development of “Guidance on selection of materials and technologies for stabilization of face and treatment of soil in construction of tunnels using tunnel boring machines” under the order of the Urban Planning Department of the city of Moscow. |
References |
1. Voznesensky A. A., Mazein S. V. Studying the variation of rotor pressing forces and horizontal soil pressure during shield tunneling. Journal of Mining Science. 2012. Vol. 48, Iss 2. pp. 233–240. 2. Herrenknecht M., Maidl U. Applying Foam for an EPB Shield Drive in Valencia. Tunnels. 1995. Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 10–19. 3. Quebaud S., Sibai M., Henry J.-P. Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earthpressure balanced shields in granular soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 1998. Vol. 13, Iss. 2. pp. 173–180. 4. Langmaak L. Soil treatment. Advanced technology of tunneling with boring machines with earth pressure support. Metro i tonneli. 2005. No. 4. pp. 18–21. 5. Sebastiani D., Miliziano S., Zanetto G., Ginanneschi R. Effectiveness of Foam Injection during Mechanized Excavation of Tunnels with TBM-EPB Technology. The Role of Underground Space in Building Future Sustainable Cities : Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress. Dubai, 2018. pp. 3813–3826. 6. Mazein S. V., Voznesenskiy A. S. Soil treatment in shield tunneling. Metro i tonneli. 2018. No. 4. pp. 34–36. 7. Fedunets B. I., Potapov M. A. Innovative monitoring of the EPB Shields without upsetting the earth’s surface. Metro i tonneli. 2017. No. 1-2. pp. 28–31. 8. Chunyuk D. Yu., Kosareva V. A., Kosareva Vik. A. Tunnel drilling machine selection for severe ground conditions. Nauchnoe obozrenie. 2016. No. 22. pp. 53–56. 9. Roby J., Willis D. Raising EPB performance in metro-sized machines. Metro i tonneli. 2017. No. 5-6. pp. 43–49. 10. Kim U. Y. EPBM design and operation in boulder conditions. Metro i tonneli. 2017. No. 3–4. pp. 43–48. 11. Mazein S. V. Optimization of rotor equipment and periodicity of replacement of the cutting tool at shield drivage of tunnel and other mine excavation. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2009. No. 10. pp. 84–86. 12. Tikhomirov V. K. Foams. Theory and practice of preparation and breakdown. 2nd enlarged edition. Moscow : Khimiya, 1983. 264 p. 13. Yuanli Wu, Mooney M. A., Minsu Cha. An experimental examination of foam stability under pressure for EPB TBM tunneling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2018. Vol. 77. pp. 80–93. 14. GOST 10181–2000. Concrete mixtures. Methods of testing. Moscow : GUP TsPP, 2001. 35 p. 15. Zhang S.-C., He S.-H., Zhu Z.-P., Li C.-H. Research on soil conditioning for earth pressure balance shield tunneling in Lanzhou sandy pebble strata with rich water. Yantu Lixue/Rock and Soil Mechanics. 2017. Vol. 38. pp. 279–286. 16. GOST 310.4–81. Cements. Мethods of bending and compression strength determination (with changes No. 1, 2). Moscow : IPK Iz datelstvo standartov, 2003. 11 p. 17. Guglielmetti V., Grasso P., Mahtab A., Shulin Xu. Mechanized Tunnelling in Urban Areas: Design Methodology and Construction Control. London : CRC Press, 2008. 528 p. 18. Mori L., Alavi E., Mooney M. Apparent density evaluation methods to assess the effectiveness of soil conditioning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2017. Vol. 67. pp. 175–186. |