Journals →  Eurasian mining →  2018 →  #2 →  Back

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ArticleName Remote monitoring data on opencast mining and disturbed land ecology in the Bakal iron ore field
DOI 10.17580/em.2018.02.08
ArticleAuthor Zenkov I. V., Vokin V. N., Kiryushina E. V., Raevich K. V.
ArticleAuthorData

Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia:

Zenkov I. V., Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Honored Ecologist of Russian Federation, zenkoviv@mail.ru
Vokin V. N., Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
Kiryushina E. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
Raevich K. V., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Currently in the Middle and South Ural in Russia, opencast mining operations are being closed in many iron ore fields. Opencast iron ore mines are closed in the Magnitogorsk, Goroblagodat, Vysokogorsky, Bakal and Tukan fields. The Bakal siderite ore reserves total 1 billion tons, which governs inclusion of the deposit in the group of the world’s largest iron ore provinces. At the closing stage of the Bakal field development (2007–2013), overburden dumping and iron ore haulage to processing plant were carried out using dump trucks with a capacity of 40–55 t. Mining equipment included excavators EKG-5A for overburden excavation and drill rigs SBSH-250 for drilling-and-blasting. The long-term remote ecological monitoring of the mining-disturbed lands in the territory of the Bakal iron ore field estimates the rate of expansion in the area with vegetation ecosystem as 7.9 ha yearly. It is found that overburden dumps show the first signs of revegetation 2–3 years after dumping termination, and the mature grass cover appears on the surface of dumps in 5–6 years. Later on, in 10–12 on these dumps, young mixed forest shows itself and then becomes the mature forest in 16–18 years. All these facts confirm ecologically admissible rates of the planting ecosystem restoration in the course of self-planting of aboriginal wood and shrub species from the native areas adjoining the closed overburden dumps and open pits. The total area of the disturbed lands occupied by the industrial landscape formed in the course of the Bakal iron ore mining totals 2065.9 ha in 2018. The areas containing all types of vegetation cover, including the areas showing revegetation, make 1588.7 ha. By the end of the monitoring period, the reestablishment of vegetation cover in the mining-disturbed lands is at the high level of 79.8 %.

keywords South Ural, Bakal iron ore field, opencast iron ore mines, truckand-railroad car-piled dumps, earth remote sensing, ecological monitoring, vegetation ecosystems
References

1. Zenkov I. V., Nefedov B. N., Yuronen Yu. P., Nefedov N. B. Results of remote sensing of mining and vegetation eco-system generation at Erkovets open pit mine in the Amur Region. Gornyy Zhurnal. 2017. No. 8. pp. 78–82. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.08.15
2. Zenkov I. V., Yuronen Yu. P., Nefedov B. N., Zayats V. V. Remote monitoring of ecological state of disturbed lands in the area of Trojanovo open pit coal mine in Bulgaria. Eurasian Mining. 2017. No. 1. pp. 38–41. DOI: 10.17580/em.2017.01.10
3. Hung T. L., Zenkov I. V., Anishchenko Yu. A., Ragozina M. A., Fedorov V. A. Remote sensing techniques for soil moisture monitoring using Landsat data in Thach Ha district with open mining operation in Vietnam. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2017. Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 42–47.
4. Timofeeva S. S., Lugovtsova N. Yu. Analysis of environmental status of mining industry in Kuzbass. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2017. No. 6. pp. 350–361.
5. Ulrikh D. V., Timofeeva S. S., Denisov S. E. Assessment of ecological impact of mineral mining and processing industry in the Chelyabinsk Region. Gornyy Zhurnal. 2015. No. 5. pp. 94–99. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2015.05.20
6. Semina I. S., Androkhanov V. A. Mined land reclamation in Kuzbass. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2014. No. 12. pp. 307–314.
7. Im S. T., Kharuk V. I. Water mass dynamics in permafrost of Central Siberia based on GRACE gravity data. Geophysical Processes and Biosphere. 2015. Vol. 14. No. 1. pp. 53–69.
8. Naeth M. A., Wilkinson S. R. Establishment of restoration trajectories for upland tundra communities on diamond mine wastes in the Canadian Arctic. Restoration Ecology. 2014. Vol. 22 (4). pp. 534–543.
9. Sena K., Barton C., Hall S., Angel P., Agouridis C., Warner R. Influence of spoil type on afforestation success and natural vegetative recolonization on a surface coal mine in Appalachia, United States. Restoration Ecology. 2015. Vol. 23 (2). pp. 131–138.
10. Gilland K. E., McCarthy B. C. Microtopography influences early successional plant communities on experimental coal surface mine land reclamation. Restoration Ecology. 2014. Vol. 22 (2). pp. 232–239.
11. Ngugil M. R., Neldner V. J., Doley D., Kusy B., Moore D., Richter C. Soil moisture dynamics and restoration of self-sustaining native vegetation ecosystem on an open-cut coal mine. Restoration Ecology. 2015. Vol. 23 (5). pp. 615–624.
12. Strunk S., Houben B., Krudewig W. Controlling the Rhenish opencast mines during the transition of the energy industry. World of Mining—Surface & Underground. 2016. Vol. 68, No. 5. pp. 289–300.
13. Abdullah M. M., Feagin R. A., Musawi L., Whisenant S., Popescu S. The use of remote sensing to develop a site history for restoration planning in an arid landscape. Restoration Ecology. 2016. Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 91–99.
14. Zweig C. L., Newman S. Using landscape context to map invasive species with medium resolution satellite imagery. Restoration Ecology. 2015. Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 524–530.
15. Borrelle S. B., Buxton R. T., Jones H. P., Towns D. R. A GISbased decision-making approach for prioritizing seabird management following predator eradication. Restoration Ecology. 2015. Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 580–587.
16. Shoo L. P., Scarth P., Schmidt S., Wilson K. A. Reclaiming degraded rainforest: a spatial evaluation of gains and losses in subtropical Eastern Australia to inform future investment in restoration. Restoration Ecology. 2013. Vol. 21. No. 4. pp. 481–489.
17. Available at: https://www.google.com/earth/ (accessed: 01.10.18)
18. Available at: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed: 01.10.18)
19. Available at: http://mining-enc.ru/ (accessed: 01.10.18)
20. Available at: http://agrien.ru/reg (accessed: 01.10.18)

Full content Remote monitoring data on opencast mining and disturbed land ecology in the Bakal iron ore field
Back