Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2018 →  #7 →  Back

DEVELOPMENT OF DEPOSITS OF URANIUM ORE
ArticleName Improving efficiency of preparation of gently dipping ore body blocks for underground leaching
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2018.07.09
ArticleAuthor Medvedev V. V., Zozulya A. M., Gurov S. G.
ArticleAuthorData

Transbaikal State University, Chita, Russia:

V. V. Medvedev, Head of Chair, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, medvedevvv1963@mail.ru
A. M. Zozulya, Post-Graduate Student

 

Priargunsky Mining and Chemical Works, Krasnokamensk, Russia:
S. G. Gurov, Chief Engineer of Mine No. 8

Abstract

According to experts’ forecasts, exhaustion of active raw material supplies base at Priargunsky Mining and Chemical Works (Priargunsky) will result in depletion of mineral reserves in affiliated operating mines in the nearest 5–10 years. Prospects for maintenance of Priargunsky production capacity include construction of Mine No. 6 as well as introduction of new geotechnologies for mining and processing of poor commercial and noncommercial reserves. Heap leaching of poor ore after X-ray radiometric grading of ore and rocks lifted to the ground surface and in refuse heaps becomes a sufficiently effective method. Uranium recovery by heap leaching reaches 75% at the present day. With introduction of underground leaching of poor commercial and noncommercial ore blocks, it is expected that production output increases by 10–30% at cost reduction by 10%. Practice of underground block leaching shows that loss of strategic material should be prevented at the stage of block preparation. Improvement of preparation process should be carried out in two directions: selection of rational mining scheme and optimization of drilling-and-blasting design. Furthermore, an important task is to deal with mechanical mudding in shrinkage ore block during leaching. To this effect, it is proposed to use air-impact treatment of sites prone to caking. For preparation of gently dipping thin ore bodies, the mining system with section-by-section shrinkage is put forward, which eliminates repacking of ore after large-scale blasting. Thus, implementation of the proposed package of measures can create conditions for the increase in the useful component recovery to 70–75%.

keywords Geotechnology, underground block leaching, panel preparation, controllable crushing, mudding, uranium recovery, uranium mineralization, ore grading, drilling-and-blasting, optimization
References

1. Svyatetsky V.S., Solodov I. N. Technological advancement strategy of uranium mining industry in Russia. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015. No. 7. pp. 68–76. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2015.07.10
2. Arens V. Zh. Physicochemical geotechnology. Moscow : MGGU. 2001. 656 p.
3. Kultyshev V. I., Kolesaev V. B., Litvinenko V. G., Bryukhovetsky O. S. Improvement of underground uranium mining efficiency. Moscow : MGIU. 2007. 212 p.
4. Beidin A. V., Ovseichuk V. A., Morozov A. A. Analysis of ore leachability in open stoping depending on geological and technological factors. Vestnik Zabaikalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. Vol. 23, No. 9. pp. 4–11.
5. Lizunkin M. V. Preparation fl owcharts for underground block leaching in Streltsov ore field development. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2016. No. 3. pp. 297–305.
6. Ovseichuk V. A., Medvedev V. V., Zozulya A. M. Improvement of underground block leaching preparation at the Streltsov hard uranium-bearing ore deposit. Vestnik Zabaikalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. Vol. 23, No. 12. pp. 32–40.
7. Medvedev V. V. Enhancing efficiency of underground uranium ore block leaching by drilling-andblasting design adjustment during block preparation. Vestnik Zabaikalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2016. Vol. 22, No. 11. pp. 4–13.
8. Tyupin V. N., Lizunkin M. V., Lizunkin V. M. Determination of fragmentation zone radius in high-stress fractured rock mass under simultaneous blasting of several parallel closely spaced blastholes. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2015. No. 12. pp. 46−51.
9. Renard S., Sterpenich J., Pironon J., Chiquet P., Randi A. Geochemical effects of an oxycombustion stream containing SO2 and O2 on carbonate rocks in the context of CO2 storage. Chemical Geology. 2014. Vol. 382. pp. 140–152.
10. Lizunkin V. M., Morozov A. A. Development of uranium heap leaching at Priargunsky Mining and Chemical Works. Gornyi informatsionno-analiticheskii byulleten. 2008. No. 6. pp. 321−324.
11. Gajda D., Kiegiel K., Zakrzewska-Koltuniewicz G., Chajduk E., Bartosiewicz I., Wolkowicz S. Mineralogy and uranium leaching of ores from Triassic Peribaltic sandstones. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2015. Vol. 303, Iss. 1. pp. 521–529.
12. Haile S. S., Merkel B. J. Simulation of uranium tailing leaching using VS2DRT. HYDRUS software applications to subsurface flow and contaminant transport problems: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference. Prague. 2013. pp. 119–127.
13. Wanees S. A., Daher A. M., Haroun Y. S. A., Gouda M. M., Abdulla A. M., Ali A. H. Leaching, purification and extraction of uranium from salcrete deposits–Egypt. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology. 2013. Vol. 8, Iss. 2. pp. 46–56.

Full content Improving efficiency of preparation of gently dipping ore body blocks for underground leaching
Back