ArticleName |
Influence of coke nut introduction in blast furnace charge on melting parameters |
ArticleAuthorData |
Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University (Magnitogorsk, Russia):
M. V. Chukin, Dr. Eng., Prof., First Vice-Rector on Science and Innovations, Dept. "Materials Processing Technologies" S. K. Sibagatullin, Dr. Eng., Prof., Dept. "Foundry Production and Material Science" A. S. Kharchenko, Cand. Eng., Ass. Prof., Dept. "Foundry Production and Material Science" V. P. Chernov, Dr. Eng., Prof., Dept. "Foundry Production and Material Science"
Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works (Magnitogorsk, Russia): G. N. Logachev, Engineer, Scientific and Technical Center
E-mail: 10skt@mail.ru; as.mgtu@mail.ru; tchernov42@mail.ru; lokkigrom@mail.ru |
Abstract |
The effect of coke nut introduction in charge material (in the amount 10.9–12.8 kg per ton of hot metal) on operation parameters of blast furnaces with volume 1370 and 2014 m3 have been established via industrial investigations. These blast furnaces are operating in the conditions of bottom and top areas determining by their gas dynamics. Parameters of gas dynamic conditions, fuel burning, iron reduction from FeO using different reducing agents, furnace thermal operation and hearth drainage capacity are analyzed. Introduction of coke nut in the iron ore part of charge material has increased its equivalent surface coarseness and thereby improved its gas permeability. It is shown that blast furnaces operating with the top area determining by gas dynamics are characterized by decrease of charge resistance coefficient on top throat by 7.1%. Each 10 kg of coke nut on 1 t of hot metal allowed to add 400 m3/h of natural gas without arise of difficulties of a furnace operation. It accompanied by rise of heat exchange intensity for the temperatures below 850 °C, by increase of Fe reduction degree from FeO by hydrogen and by rise of its usage degree. The maximal increase of technical and economical melting parameters has been observed for the furnace with volume 2014 m3. Lowering of specific coke consumption (both actual and adduced to the equal conditions) made 0,76 and 0.88 kg per 1 kg of coke nut respectively. Usage of coke nut in the furnace operating with bottom limiting area by its gas dynamics was characterized by the negative nut effect on filtrating ability of coke packing in the furnace hearth. Introduction of 12.8 kg of nut per 1 t of hot metal has accompanied by increase of the amount of slag remaining in the furnace from 7 to 9 m3, by enlargement of the time interval between the beginning of hot metal tapping and slag appearance from 9.5 to 8.4 min and by toughness rise from 0.40 to 0.45 Pa·s.
The study has been carried out under financial support of the RF Ministry of education and science in the framework of realization of the complex project on creation of high-tech production with participation of a high school (Agreement No. 02.G25.31.0178 dated 01.12.2015). |
References |
1. Druzhinin G. M., Zainullin L. A., kazyaev M. D., Spirin N. A. et al. Resursoenergeticheskie problemy chernoy metallurgii (Resource-saving problems of the iron and steel industry). Izvestiya vuzov. Chernaya metallurgiya = Bulletin of high schools. Iron and steel industry. 2014. No. 1. pp. 3–8. 2. Dobroskok V. A., Kurunov I. F., Lipukhin Yu. V. et al. Sposob zagruzki v domennuyu pech tverdoy toplivnoy dobavki (The method of charging the solid fuel additive in a blast furnace). Patent RF, № 2042714, 1993. 3. Dobroskok V. A., Lipukhin Yu. V., Kurunov I. F., Loginov V. N. Development of charging protocol and experience in using small-fraction coke in high-capacity blast furnace. Steel in Translation. 1998. No. 1. pp. 7–13. 4. Nikitin L. D., Maryasov M. F., Gorbachev V. P., Bugaev S. F. Blast furnace operation with coke fines. Metallurgist. 1999. No. 1. pp. 38–39. 5. Pishnograev S. N., Chevychelov A. V., Gostenin V. A., Shtafienko N. S., Gridasov V. P. Using coke fines in the blast furnaces at OAO MMK. Steel in Translation. 2009. Vol. 39. No. 10. pp. 878–881. 6. Kuzin A. V. Povedenie zhelezorudnykh materialov v zone kogezii pri zagruzke ikh v smesi s koksovym oreshkov (Behaviour of iron ore materials in a cohesion area during their charging in the mixes with coke nut). Metallurgicheskie protsessy i oborudovanie = Metallurgical processes and equipment. 2010. No. 3. pp. 4–7. 7. Gorin D. V., Khrapko A. V., Kuzin A. V. Issledovanie protsessa polucheniya i effektivnost primeneniya koksovogo oreshka v domennoy plavke (Study of fabrication process and usage efficiency of coke nut in the blast furnace melting). Metallurgicheskie protsessy i oborudovanie = Metallurgical processes and equipment. 2011. No. 3. pp. 10–16. 8. Babich A., Senk D., Gudenau H. W. Effect of coke reactivity and nut coke on blast furnace operation. Ironmaking and Steelmaking. 2009. Vol. 36. Issue 3. pp. 222–229. 9. Kuzin A. V. Effect of introducing different sizes of nut coke into ore layer on the degree of reduction of iron oxides. Metallurgist. 2014. Vol. 57 (No. 9–10). pp. 783–791. 10. Watakabe S., Takeda K., Nishimura H., Goto S., Nishimura N., Uchida T., Kiguchi M. ISIJ International. 2006. Issue 4. pp. 513–522. 11. Mousa E., Senk D., Babich A. Reduction of Pellets-Nut Coke Mixture under Simulating Blast Furnace Condition. Steel Research International. 2010. Vol. 81. Issue 9. pp. 706–715. 12. Sibagatullin S. K., Kharchenko A. S., Chevychelov A. V. et al. Vliyanie koksovogo oreshka na filtratsiyu zhidkikh produktov plavki v gorne domennoy pechi (Influence of coke nut on filtration of liquid melting products in a blast furnace hearth). Vestnik MGTU im. Nosova = Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2010. No. 4. pp. 26–28. 13. Lavrov V. V., Spirin N. A., Burylin A. A. et al. Simulation of heat transfer processes and assessment of the viscoplastic parameters of iron ore in blast furnaces. Steel in Translation. 2013. Vol. 43. No. 4. pp. 171–175. 14. Sibagatullin S. K., Kharchenko A. S., Beginyuk V. A. Processing solutions for optimum implementation of blast furnace operation. Metallurgist. 2014. Vol. 58. No. 3-4. pp. 285–293. 15. Kurunov I. F. Efficiency of using different types of char ging apparatuses on blast furnaces. Metallurgist. 2009. Vol. 53. No. 11–12. pp. 661–671. 16. Chevychelov A. V., Pavlov A. V., Teplykh E. O. et al. Charging coke nuts in the batch bunker. Steel in Translation. 2013. Vol. 43. No. 7. pp. 434–435. 17. Huatao Z., Minghua Z., Ping D. et al. Uneven distribution of burden materials at blast furnace top in bell-less top with parallel bunkers. ISIJ International. 2012. Vol. 52. Issue 12. pp. 2177–2185. 18. Pykhteeva K. B., Zagainov S. A., Tleugabulov B. S., Filippov V. V., Nikolaev F. P., Belov V. V. Stabilizing the composition of blast furnace products from titanomagnetites with a nonconical loading trough. Steel in Translation. 2009. Vol. 39. No. 6. pp. 45–49. 19. Sibagatullin S. K., Kharchenko A. S., Logachev G. N. The rational mode of nut coke charging into the blast furnace by compact trough-type charging device. International Journal of advanced manufacturing Technology. 2016. Vol. 86. pp. 531–537. |