Журналы →  Eurasian Mining →  2025 →  №1 →  Назад

POWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT. AUTOMATION
Название Comparison of approaches to assessing energy efficiency of technological processes
DOI 10.17580/em.2025.01.19
Автор Deryabin S. A., Rzazade U. A., Agabubaev A. T., Temkin I. O.
Информация об авторе

NUST MISIS, Moscow, Russia

Deryabin S. A., Senior Lecturer
Rzazade U. A., Senior Lecturer
Agabubaev A. T., Senior Lecturer
Temkin I. O., Head of Department, Associate Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, temkin.io@misis.ru

Реферат

This paper examines the issues of assessing the energy efficiency of technological processes to ensure sustainable development and rational management of mining enterprises in accordance with international standard ISO 50001. The main idea of the work is a comparative analysis of the traditional approach based on the calculation of specific energy consumption (SEC) values, used by many domestic and foreign enterprises as a key indicator of efficiency, and an approach based on the stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) methods. The rationale for the need to assess energy efficiency is given, taking into account the nonlinearity and stochasticity of technological processes of mining enterprises, as well as the features of the technical and operational characteristics of individual energy-consuming objects and environmental conditions. During the work, the computational experiments were carried out as a case study of production activities of EKG-10 excavators for 2021–2023. Based on the results of the work, the nonlinear relationship between the key parameters of energy efficiency monitoring and the adequacy of the proposed method for solving the problem is proved. The comparative estimates of potential energy losses with different approaches to analyzing the activities of enterprises are presented, showing potential hidden energy losses when using SEC of more than 30% of the total volume.

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 23-11-00197.

Ключевые слова Specific energy consumption, SEC, stochastic frontier analysis, SFA, Cobb–Douglas production function, opencast mining enterprises, energy efficiency, ISO 50001:2018, excavator, sustainable development
Библиографический список

1. Amez I., León D., Ivannikov A., Kolikov K., Castells B. Potential of CBM as an energy vector in active mines and abandoned mines in Russia and Europe. Energies. 2023. Vol. 16, Iss. 3. ID 1196.
2. Rybak Ya., Khayrutdinov M. M., Kongar-Syuryun Ch. B., Tyulyaeva Yu. S. Resource-saving technologies for development of mineral deposits. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2021. Vol. 13, No. 3(49). pp. 406–415.
3. Brahmana R. K., Ono H. Energy efficiency and company performance in Japanese listed companies. International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy. 2020. Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 24–40.
4. Arriola-Medellin A. M., Lopez-Cisneros L. F., Aragon-Aguilar A. et al. Energy efficiency to increase production and quality of products in industrial processes: Case study oil and gas processing center. Energy Efficiency. 2019. Vol. 12. pp. 1619–1634.
5. Lyakhomskii A. V., Petrochenkov A. B., Petukho S. V., Perfileva E. N. Consulting on energy management systems in mining industry. Eurasian Mining. 2022. No. 2. pp. 30–33.
6. Petrochenkov A., Lyakhomskii A., Romodin A. et al. Improving the energy efficiency of an electric submersible pump installation using an integrated logistics support approach. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, Iss. 15. ID 11845.
7. Galiev Zh. K., Galieva N. V. Development of the fuel and energy sector in compliance with the energy strategy in Russia. MIAB. 2019. No. 6. pp. 215–220.
8. Zhukovskiy Y., Tsvetkov P., Buldysko A. et al. Scenario modeling of sustainable development of energy supply in the Arctic. Resources. 2021. Vol. 10, Iss. 12. ID 124.
9. Lisin E., Kurdiukova G. Energy supply system development management mechanisms from the standpoint of efficient use of energy resources. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 666. ID 062090.
10. Puchkov L. A., Kaledina N. O., Kobylkin S. S. Global energy consumption: Forecasts and reality. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 1. pp. 4–6.
11. Lawrence A., Thollander P., Andrei M., Karlsson M. Specific Energy Consumption/Use (SEC) in energy management for improving energy efficiency in industry: Meaning, usage and differences. Energies. 2019. Vol. 12, Iss. 2. ID 247.
12. Lyakhomskii A. V., Perfil’eva E. N., Kutepov A. G. Analysis of the coal industry organizations activities on provision improve energy efficiency. Ugol. 2021. No. 4. pp. 32–36.
13. Tsvetkov P., Samuseva P. Heterogeneity of the impact of energy production and consumption on national greenhouse gas emission. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024. Vol. 434. ID 139639.
14. Stead A., Wheat P., Greene W. Robustness in Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Economic Efficiency Analysis. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. 2023. Vol. 692. pp. 197–228.
15. Awuma W., Amankwa I. A., Richard A., Danso I. Parametric versus nonparametric models in Stochastic Frontier Analysis: A theoretical review. European Journal of Science, Innovation and Technology. 2024. Vol. 4(2). pp. 1–12.
16. Krivonozhko V. E., Afanasiev A. P., Førsund F. R., Lychev A. V. Comparison of different methods for estimation of returns to scale in nonradial data envelopment analysis models. Automation and Remote Control. 2022. Vol. 83. pp. 1136–1148.
17. Rzazade U., Deryabin S., Temkin I., Kondratev, E., Ivannikov A. On the issue of the creation and functioning of energy efficiency management systems for technological processes of mining enterprises. Energies. 2023. Vol. 16, Iss. 13. ID 4878.
18. Ishikawa A., Fujimoto S., Mizuno T. Why does production function take the Cobb–Douglas form? Evolution and Institutional Economics Review. 2021. Vol. 18. pp. 79–102.
19. Yuan C., Liu S., Wu J. Research on energy-saving effect of technological progress based on Cobb–Douglas production function. Energy Policy. 2009. Vol. 37, Iss. 8. pp. 2842–2846.
20. Farrell M. J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). 1957. Vol. 120, Iss. 3. pp. 253–290.
21. Farrell M. J., Fieldhouse M. Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). 1962. Vol. 125, Iss. 2. pp. 252–267.
22. Aigner D., Lovell C. A. K., Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 1977. Vol. 6. pp. 21–37.
23. Meeusen W., van Den Broeck J. Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 433–444.
24. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 1978. Vol. 2. pp. 429–444.
25. Xu H., Pang G., Wang Y., Wang Y. Deep Isolation Forest for anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 2023. Vol. 35, Iss. 12. pp. 12591–12604.
26. Lesouple J., Baudoin C., Spigai M., Tourneret J.-Y. Generalized isolation forest for anomaly detection. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2021. Vol. 149. pp. 109–119.

Полный текст статьи Comparison of approaches to assessing energy efficiency of technological processes
Назад