Air Force Officer College, Nha Trang, Vietnam¹ ; Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia²
Nguyen Huu Hai, PhD. Eng., Lecturer¹, Doctoral Student², e-mail: nquan6799@gmail.com

Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia
S. A. Zaydes, Dr. Eng., Prof., Dept. of Materials Science, Welding and Additive Technologies, e-mail: zsa@istu.edu

The article presents the results of finite element modeling of the reverse burnishing process to determine the components of the temporary stress tensor and the intensity of temporary stresses depending on the main hardening parameters. Based on the results of experimental studies, the influence of reverse burnishing parameters on the microhardness value and the depth of the hardened layer was determined. A correlation has been established between the maximum value of temporary stress components and the depth of their occurrence with the maximum microhardness and depth of the strengthened layer. The results of regression analysis show that the value of the maximum microhardness during reverse burnishing most closely correlates with the maximum value of compressive tangential temporary stresses, the correlation between them is determined by the following equation: H_мах = (2E – 06)(σ^vr_φmax)² – 0.3025σ^vr_φmax + 61.335 (approximation reliability coefficient R² = 0.9874). And the depth of the strengthened layer is with the maximum value of radial temporary stresses, the correlation dependence between them is determined by the following equation: h_max = (2E – 06)(σ^vr_φmax)² + 0.0035σ^vr_φmax + 2.3264 (approximation reliability coefficient R² = 0.9874). Evaluating the presented equations based on the approximation reliability coefficients, we can say with confidence that there is a fairly close connection between the microhardness value and the depth of the hardened layer with the parameters of compressive temporary stresses and their depth. The obtained empirical equations make it possible, based on the results of determining the maximum value of the components of temporary compressive stresses and the depth of their occurrence, to determine the maximum microhardness and depth of the strengthened layer. Thus, based on the results of modeling the stress state in the deformation zone, it is possible to determine the main characteristics of the layer being strengthened without destroying the parts.

1. Smelyansky V. M. Mechanics of hardening of parts by surface plastic deformation. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 2002. 300 p.
2. Odintsov L. G. Strengthening and finishing of parts by surface plastic deformation. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 1987. 328 p.
3. Suslov A. G. Quality of the surface layer of machine parts. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 2000. 320 p.
4. Shiryaev A. A., Trofimov V. N., Karmanov V. V. Methods of plastic surface deformation as a technology for quality control of the surface layer of aircraft and mechanical engineering parts (review). Aerokosmicheskaya tekhnika, vysokie tekhnologii i innovatsii. 2017. Vol. 1. pp. 296–299.
5. Jong-Hwa Hong, Hyeonil Park, Jinsu Kim, Moo-Young Seok et al. Effect of the residual stress induced by surface severe plastic deformation on the tensile behavior of an aluminum alloy. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2023. Vol. 24. pp. 7076–7090.
6. Radchenko V. P., Saushkin M. N., Bochkova T. I. Mathematical modeling and experimental study of the formation and relaxation of residual stresses in flat samples of EP742 alloy after ultrasonic hardening under high-temperature creep conditions. Vestnik Permskogo natsionalnogo issledovatelskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Mekhanika. 2016. No. 1. pp. 93–112.
7. Shvetsov A. N., Skuratov D. L. Influence of diamond smoothing process parameters on the quality of the surface layer of parts in the production of aviation equipment. Vestnik Moskovskogo aviatsionnogo instituta. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 4. pp. 220–231.
8. Lebedev V. A. Structural-energy model for assessing the fatigue strength of parts strengthened by surface plastic deformation methods. Fundamentalnye i prikladnye problemy tekhniki i tekhnologii. 2011. No. 4-3(288). pp. 36–40.
9. Gorbunov A. V., Gorbunov V. F. Substantiation of the depth of hardening of non-rigid shafts during surface plastic deformation by a centrifugal roller. Vestnik IrGTU. 2012. No. 9 (68). pp. 29–33.
10. Suslov A. G., Gurov R. V., Tishevskikh E. S. Finishing and hardening treatment by surface plastic deformation. Uprochnyayushchie tekhnologii i pokrytiya. 2008. No. 9. pp. 20–23.
11. Del G. D. Determination of stresses in the plastic region by hardness distribution. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 1971. 199 p.
12. Yaroslavtsev V. M. Mechanics of the cutting process of plastically deformed metals with nonuniform properties across the thickness of the cut layer. Vestnik MGTU. Seriya “Mashinostroenie“. 1993. No. 4. pp. 93–103.
13. Zahra Zaiemyekeh, Haoyang Li, Saman Sayahlatifi, Min Ji et al. Computational finite element modeling of stress-state- and strain-rate-dependent failure behavior of ceramics with experimental validation. Ceramics International. 2023. Vol. 49. pp. 13878–13895.
14. Naresh Subedi, Taku Obara, Susumu Kono. Noncompact and slender concrete-filled steel tubes under axial compression: Finite-element modeling and evaluation of stress-strain models for fiber-based analysis. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2022. Vol. 196. 107353.
15. Zaydes S. A., Nguyen Khyu Khaj. Method for surface plastic deformation of the outer surfaces of bodies of rotation. Patent RF, No. 2758713. Applied: 14.01.2021. Published: 01.11.2021. Bulletin No. 31.
16. Zaydes S. A., Nguyen Khyu Khaj. Influence of reversible surface plastic deformation on chan ges in the grain structure of carbon steel. Chernye Metally. 2023. No. 6. pp. 61–70.
17. Zaydes S. A., Nguyen Khyu Khaj. Mechanical properties of the hardened layer under reversible surface plastic deformation. Uprochnyayushchie tekhnologii i pokrytiya. 2023. Vol. 19. No. 7(223). pp. 304–311.
18. Zhihui Liu, Zhihui Li, Qiang Ma. Nonlinear finite element algorithm for solving fully coupled thermomechanical problems under strong aerothermodynamic environment. Acta Astronautica. 2023. Vol. 203. pp. 252–267.
19. Anant Prakash Agrawal, Shahazad Ali, Sachin Rathore. Finite element stress analysis for shape optimization of spur gear using ANSYS. Materials today: Proceedings. 2022. Vol. 64. pp. 1147–1152.
20. Kajal Chourasia, Sharnappa Joladarashi. Modelling, static and dynamic analysis of offset bearing using ANSYS. Materials today: Proceedings. 2022. Vol. 66. pp. 2124–2132.
21. Zaydes S. A., Nguyen Khyu Khaj. The influence of toroidal tool kinematics on the residual stress-strain state of the surface layer of machine parts. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Mashinostroenie. 2022. No. 7 (748). pp. 33–41.
22. Bonte M. H. A., de Boer A., Liebregts R. Determining the von Mises stress power spectral density for frequency domain fatigue analysis including out-of-phase stress components. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2007. Vol. 302. pp. 379–386.
23. Filipe Meirelles Fonseca, Paulo Batista Gonçalves. Nonlinear behavior and instabilities of a hyperelastic von Mises truss. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics. 2022. Vol. 142. 103964.
24. Zaydes S. A., Nguyen Khyu Khaj. The influence of tool geometry on the stress-strain state of cylindrical parts during reversible surface plastic deformation. Vestnik mashinostroeniya. 2023. Vol. 102. No. 7. pp. 580–585.