ArticleName |
Experimental validation of ore testing results at Talnakh Concentrator |
ArticleAuthorData |
Gipronikel Institute LLC, Saint Petersburg, Russia:
A. N. Glazatov, Lead Researcher at the Pyrometallurgical Laboratory, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: glazatovAN@nornik.ru
Medvezhiy Ruchey LLC, Norilsk, Russia: V. Yu. Lunev, Chief Engineer
MMC Norilsk Nickel, Moscow, Russia: E. V. Parievskiy, Head of the Science and Technology Directorate, Production Office, Production Department
MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division, Norilsk, Russia: E. V. Danchenko, Deputy Head of the Science and Technology Directorate |
Abstract |
To validate the result of incoming inspection with regard to the blend of crushed high-grade cupriferous and disseminated ores coming from Oktyabrsky, Taymyrsky and Komsomolsky (Skalistaya mine) pits, a comparative test was conducted to determine the weight fractions of nickel, copper and sulphur. The test was conducted on the sample preparation plant located in the crusher building of Talnakh Concentrator per GOST R ISO 11648-2–2009 by means of minimum-shift sampling. Two separate sampling techniques were used on the functioning conveyors designated as A and B for the purposes of this paper. The techniques include the existing one based on the use of automatic bucket sampler and a technique when a standard sample is collected with a template directly from the conveyor belt that gets stopped once the bucket sampler has activated. The average divergence indicators obtained for samples d Ni , d Cu and d S are situated close to zero and are equal to 0.045; –0.016; 0.042 and 0.047; 0.014; 0.191 wt. % for conveyors A and B, correspondingly. It is demonstrated that all the values in the analyzed samples conform with the normal distribution law. T-test revealed no systematic discrepancies, which proves that there is no difference between the two sampling techniques. It means that the divergence indicators obtained belong to the same general population, and this proves the correctness of the sampling performed and the effectiveness of the existing incoming ore inspection system. Based on the experimental data and per OST 41-08-212–04, allowable error values were determined for Category III techniques. Based on the above values, allowable divergence values were calculated between two test results, with the confidence figure Р = 0.95 (of the repeatability limit). The values are 0.29, 0.33 and 0.82% for nickel, copper and sulphur, respectively.
The authors would like to thank Mr. N. Yu. Enikeev, chief metrologist at Gipronikel Institute, for advisory support; shift supervisors, dispatchers and crusher personnel of Talnakh Concentrator for conducting preparation, commissioning and experimental work, as well as leaders and personnel of the Analytics Directorate for their work with the samples. |
keywords |
Lump ore, conveyor, test, nickel, copper, sulphur, shift technique, bucket sampler, template, standard sample, analysis, discrepancy sampling, allowable error, repeatability limit |
References |
1. TR 49156713.14.39-65–2021. Mineral processing at Talnakh Concentrator. Standard operating procedure. Introduced: 28.06.2021. Norilsk : ZF PAO “GMK “Norilskiy nikel”, 2021. 2. I 49156713.14.39-6–2019. Sample preparation plant for blending high-grade, cupriferous and disseminated ores incoming in the crusher building of Talnakh Concentrator, MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. Operation and maintenance procedure. Guidelines. Introduced: 03.06.2019. Norilsk : ZF PAO “GMK “Norilskiy nikel”, 2019. 3. STO 49156713.14.35-6-28–2018. Inspection, testing and analysis. Products of Talnakh Concentrator, MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. Sampling, sample preparation and testing. Introduced: 28.05.2018. Norilsk : ZF PAO “GMK “Norilskiy nikel”, 2018. 4. STO 49156713.14.111-5-31–2018. Inspection, testing and analysis. Ores supplied by the mining sites of MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. Monitoring and calculation of ore weight, as well as the weight of reportable components. Introduced: 10.04.2018. Norilsk : ZF PAO “GMK “Norilskiy nikel”, 2018. 5. GOST 14180–80. Ores and concentrates of non-ferrous metals. Methods of sampling and preparation of samples for chemical analysis and determination of moisture. Introduced: 01.07.1980. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 1980. 6. STO 35-12-110–2020. In-process measurements, testing and analysis. X-ray fluorescence methods for determining the weight fractions of copper, nickel, cobalt, iron, sulphur and oxides of silicon, calcium, aluminium and magnesium in sampled products of MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division. Introduced: 07.09.2020. Norilsk : ZF PAO “GMK “Norilskiy nikel”, 2020. 7. GOST R ISO 11648-1–2009. Statistical methods. Sampling from bulk materials. Part 1. General principles. Introduced: 01.12.2010. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2009. 8. GOST R ISO 11648-2–2009. Statistical methods. Sampling from bulk materials. Part 2. Sampling of particulate materials. Introduced: 01.12.2010. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2009. 9. GOST R ISO 3534-2–2019. Statistical methods. Vocabulary and symbols. Part 2. Applied statistics. Introduced: 01.01.2020. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2019. 10. GOST R 50779.21–2004. Statistical methods. Determination rules and methods for calculation of statistical characteristics based on sample data. Part 1. Normal distribution. Introduced: 01.06.2004. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2004. 11. GOST R 50779.23–2005 (ISO 3301:1975). Statistical methods. Statistical interpretation of data. Comparison of two means in the case of paired observations. Introduced: 01.07.2005. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2005. 12. Eurachem/CITAC Guide. Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling: A guide to methods and approaches. Ed. By M. Ramsey and S. Ellison. Translated edition 1. Kiev : OOO “Yurka Lyubchenka”, 2015. 156 p. 13. Novitskiy P. V., Zograf I. A. Evaluating measurement uncertainties. Leningrad : Energoatomizdat, 1991. 304 p. 14. GOST R ISO 21748–2012. Guidance for the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. Introduced : 01.12.22013. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2012. 15. Ramsey M. H., Ellison S. L. R., Rostron P. et al. Measurement uncertainty arising from sampling: a guide to methods and approaches. 2nd edition. Eurachem. 2019. p. 109. 16. Salahuddin A. K., Mashwani W. Kh., Shafiq M., Saima Hassan et al. New advanced outliers detection tests. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. 2020. Vol. 50, Iss. 7. pp. 1640–1655. DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1741630. 17. Haolun Shi, Guosheng Yin. Reconnecting p-value and posterior probability under one- and two-sided tests. The American Statistician. 2021. Vol. 75, Iss. 3. pp. 265–275. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2020.1717621. 18. Wenger K., Less V. A modified Wilcoxon test for change points in long-range dependent time series. Economics Letters. 2020. Vol. 192. p. 109237. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109237. 19. RMG 61–2010. State system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Accuracy, trueness and precision measures of the procedures for quantitative chemical analysis. Methods of evaluation. Introduced: 01.09.2012. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2010. 20. OST 41-08-212–04. Analytics quality management. Measurement accuracy standards applicable to the chemical analysis of mineral raw materials and accuracy-based classification of laboratory analysis techniques. Introduced: 01.07.2005. Moscow : Vserossiyskiy institut mineralnogo syrya imeni N. M. Fedorovskogo, 2004. 21. GOST R ISO 5725-6–2002. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 6. Use in practice of accuracy values. Introduced: 01.11.2002. Moscow : Izdatelstvo standartov, 2002. |