Mining Institute of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, Russia:

A. A. Baryakh, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

Uralkali, Berezniki, Russia:

L. O. Tenison, Head of Design and Analysis Department, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, tenisonl@mail.ru

Safety of a water-proof pillar between the stoping void and the aquifers defines the key feature of water-soluble mineral mining. In this regard, the most important element of geomechanical supervision of mining operations, especially, at the mine project stage, is the engineering safety criteria aimed at the adequate valuation of safe undermining of water-proof strata (WPS). The WPS safety procedures now in force calculate only maximal sagging of undermined beds and disregard deformation in the edge area of WPS. In the meanwhile, the edges of WPS are the areas of localization of maximal horizontal strains, and the hazard of vertical jointing is the highest in these areas. In this connection, in the capacity of the index of the manmade load on WPS, it is proposed to use the maximal slope of the edge area of the subsidence trough. The evaluations were carried out in 6 Uralkali’s mine sites selected from the mathematical modeling and geophysical survey data which exhibited considerable damage of WPS. Based on the implemented research and justifications, it is recommended to use the generalized safety criterion for undermining of WPS as a maximal subsidence/mining depth ratio which is directly proportional to the ground slope. This engineering procedure describes more adequately the fracture mechanism in WPS rocks, in particular, damage localization in edge areas of the subsidence trough, or influence of mining depth on WPS stability and, which is main thing, is based on the criteria derived from the long-term observations and measurements performed in the Upper Kama deposit.
The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 19-77-30008.

1. Kudryashov A. I. Verkhnekamskoe salt deposit. Perm : GI UrO RAN, 2001. 429 p.
2. Shiman M. I. Avoiding of flooding of potassium mines. Moscow : Nedra, 1992. 160 p.
3. Kovalev O. V., Mozer S. P. Some approaches to secure mining of potash deposits. Journal of Mining Institute. 2014. Vol. 207. pp. 55–59.
4. Rauche H. Die Kaliindustrie im 21 Jahrhundert. Stand der Technik bei der Rohstoffgewinnung und der Rohstoffaufbereitung sowie bei der Entsorgung der dabei anfallenden Rückstände. Berlin : Springer Vieweg, 2015. 560 s.
5. Minkley W., Mühlbauer J., Lüdeling C. Dimensioning Principles in Potash and Salt: Stability and Integrity. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2016. Vol. 49, Iss. 11. pp. 4537–4555.
6. Prugger F. F., Prugger A. F. Water problems in Saskatchewan potash mining – what can be learned from them? CIM Bulletin. 1991. Vol. 84, No. 945. pp. 58–66.
7. Baryakh A. A., Samodelkina N. A. Geomechanical Estimation of Deformation Intensity above the Flooded Potash Mine. Journal of Mining Sciences. 2017. Vol. 53, Iss. 4. pp. 630–642.
8. Tenison L. O. Prediction of vertical deformations of ground surface in conditions of flooded mine Berezniki 1. GIAB. 2016. No. 1. pp. 230–242.
9. Andreichuk V., Eraso A., Domínguez. M. C. A large sinkhole in the Verchnekamsky potash basin in the urals. Mine Water and the Environment. 2000. Vol. 19, Iss. 1. pp. 2–18.
10. Whyatt J., Varley F. Catastrophic Failures of Underground Evaporite Mines. Proceedings of the 27^th International Conference on Ground Control in Mining. West Virginia : National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2008. pp. 113–122.

11. Rauche H. Sinkhole Formation over Flodded Potash Mines – Case Studies from the Motherland of the Potash Industry. Fall 2000 Meeting. San Antonio, 2000. p. 161.
12. Borzakovskiy B. A., Aptukov V. N., Tenison L. O. On possibility of new sink holes in the flooded mine Berezniki 1. GIAB. 2015. No. 10. pp. 5–13.
13. Regulations for protection of mines from floodingand protection of undermined objects from flooding and protection in Verkhnekamskoe potassium salt deposit (technological regulations). Saint Petersburg : VNIIG, 2008. 95 p.
14. Bérest P., Karimi-Jafari M., Brouard B. Geometrical versus rheological transient creep closure in a salt cavern. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 2017. Vol. 345, Iss. 11. pp. 735–741.
15. Baryakh A. A., Sanfirov I. A., Fedoseev A . K., Babkin A. I., Tsayukov A.A. Seismic–Geomechanical Control of Water-Impervious Strata in Potassium Mines. Journal of Mining Science. 2017. Vol. 53, Iss. 6. pp. 981–992.
16. Cheskidov V. V., Lipina A. V., Melnichenko I. A. Integrated monitoring of engineering structures in mining. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 2. pp. 18–21. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.02.05
17. Warren J. K. Evaporites: A Geological Compendium. 2nd ed. Cham : Springer, 2016. 1812 p.
18. Minkley W., Menzel W., Konietzky H., Te Kamp L. A visco-elasto-plastic softening model and its application for solving static and dynamic stability problems in potash mining. FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics : Proceedings of the International FLAC Symposium. London : CRC Press, 2020. pp. 21–27.
19. Baryakh A. A., Samodelkina N. A. Water-Tight Stratum Rupture under Large-Scale Mining. Part II. Journal of Mining Science. 2012. Vol. 48, Iss. 6. С. 954–961.
20. Vasilchuk M. P., Iofis M. A. Analysis of geomechanical processes and causes of accidents in the Upper Kama Potash–Magnesium Salt Deposit. Marksheyderskiy vestnik. 2007. No. 1(59). pp. 30–32.
21. Pachgin V. V. The lowering of likelihood of groundwater irruption into the mine at intensive mining of potash seams. GIAB. 2017. Special issue 5-2. Industrial safety of enterprises of mineralresource complex in the XXI century-2. pp. 126–133.