Журналы →  Tsvetnye Metally →  2020 →  №12 →  Назад

INSTITUTE GIPRONICKEL LLC. COURSE FOR TRANSFORMATION
MINING, GEOLOGY AND BENEFICATION
Название Predicted concentration performance for copper-nickel ores of the Talnakh ore cluster
DOI 10.17580/tsm.2020.12.07
Автор Khashkovskaya T. N., Lyalinov D. V., Kolesnikova E. N., Maksimov V. I.
Информация об авторе

Gipronikel Institute LLC, Saint Petersburg, Russia:

T. N. Khashkovskaya, Principal Specialist at the Laboratory for Geological Studies of Raw Materials, e-mail: KhashkovskayaTN@nornik.ru
D. V. Lyalinov, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory for Geological Studies of Raw Materials, e-mail: LyalinovDV@nornik.ru
E. N. Kolesnikova, 1st Category Engineer at the Laboratory for Geological Studies of Raw Materials, e-mail: KolesnikovaEN@nornik.ru
V. I. Maksimov, Chief of Operations Support at the Laboratory for Geological Studies of Raw Materials, e-mail: MaksimovVI@nornik.ru

Реферат

This paper describes a mineralogical study that looked at the copper-nickel ores of the Talnakh Ore Cluster. It also describes attempts to develop a method for predicting concentration performance on the basis of mapping data. The geological classification of the Talnakh ores developed in 1987–1992 is rather a classification of natural types and varieties as it fails to specify any particular concentration process indicators. The copper-nickel ores of the Talnakh Ore Cluster are multicomponent and it is quite difficult to develop a classification based on concentration performance that would account for the quality of concentrates and the recovery of non-ferrous and noble metals. In the period of 2015–2020, a series of experiments and a mineralogical study were conducted for 107 samples of impregnated ore, 105 samples of copper ore and 60 samples of high-grade ore under the contracts with the R&D Office of Nornickel’s Polar Division. Based on the results of the experiments, a classification was developed for impregnated, copper and high-grade ores based of one selected actual process indicator. Due to the use of a mining information system, each box of a block model representing an ore body (or, each mining unit with known characteristics) can be assigned appropriate concentration indicators. On the basis of geological mapping results, a method was applied for indirect calculation of expected concentration indicators based on a number of attributes. With the help of this method, the authors were able to determine the actual indicators, estimate the calculation error and find a way to improve the predictability of the model through analyzing additional samples and attributes.

Ключевые слова Commercial types of copper-nickel ores, natural ore varieties, process indicators, collective concentrate, geological mapping, machine learning, block model
Библиографический список

1. Gor bachev S. A., Balandin V. V. 40th anniversary of the Oktyabrsky mine. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2014. No. 4. pp. 5–10.
2. Volyanskiy I. V., Likhacheva T. A., Kurchukov A. M., Miller A. A. Basic aspects of Talnakh concentrator reconstruction and modernization. Tsvetnye Metally. 2020. No. 6. pp. 6–11. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2020.06.01.
3. Galaov R. B., Pelipenko E. V., Kolechko S. S. The history of development and the prospects of the raw material base owned by Nornickel’s Polar Division. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015. No. 6. pp. 7–11. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2015.06.01.
4. Smirnov G. N., Smirnov A. N., Golovina Yu. S. The Talnakh Concentrator upgrade project realization stages. Obogashchenie Rud. 2016. No. 5. pp. 55–59. DOI: 10.17580/or.2016.05.10
5. STO RosGeo 09-002–98. Solid minerals and rocks. Geological mapping. Methods. Moscow : RosGeo, 1998.
6. Petrov S. V., Mishulovich P. М., Smolensky V. V. The principles of building a block geological-and-processing model of mineral deposit. Obogashchenie Rud. 2010. No. 6. pp. 34–38.
7. Kots G. A., Chernopyatov S. F., Shmanenkov I. V. Testing and mapping of mineral deposits. Moscow : Nedra, 1980. 288 p.
8. Kozlova M. A., Ryabtsev D. A. A modern approach to geological mapping of ore deposits. Gornye nauki i tekhnologii. 2017. No. 1. pp. 23–30.
9. Lechuti-Tlhalerwa R., Coward S., Field M. Embracing step-changes in geoscientific information for effective implementation of geometallurgy. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2019. Vol. 119, No. 4. pp. 355–360.
10. Ortiz J. M., Cevik S. I., Avalos S., Kracht W., Leuangthong O. Machine learning and deep learning in predictive geometallurgical modeling. The World’s Premier Mineral Exploration and Mining Convention. Toronto, Canada, 1–4 March, 2020.
11. Baxter C. P., Plugatyr A., Gottheil J., Bedrossian S. Towards predictive geometallurgy: inferring particulate heterogeneity from image analysis. 52nd Annual Canadian Mineral Processors Operators Conference. Ottawa, 21–23 January 2020.
12. Koch P.-H., Lund C., Rosenkranz J. Automated drill core mineralogical characterization method for texture classification and modal mineralogy estimation for geometallurgy. Minerals Engineering. 2019. Vol. 136. pp. 99–109.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад