Saint-Petersburg Mining University (St. Petersburg, Russia):
Vedernikov V. V., Deputy of Scientific Director, Doctor of Historical Sciences, vedernikov75@mail.ru

The article covers ore processing for the production of silver and lead in the Nerchinsky Mountain District in the 19 century, which was first introduced there in the difficult local conditions, including poor ores with a significant diversity of properties, long distances to the Russian and European metallurgy centers, and the historically established practice of immediate ore mining without preliminary exploration of the entire deposit. This practice naturally resulted in persistently unprofitable operation of the Nerchinsky Zavod plants after 1791. The operations were only supported for the sake of supplying lead to the silver mills of Altai. In fact, the profits of the Altai mills would cover the losses of the Nerchinsky Zavod plants. Since 1821, administrative measures had been implemented at the Nerchinsky Zavod plants to ensure more thorough manual analysis and sorting of the ores; however, in 1826, conventional washing workbenches were introduced for the washing of ore fines without differentiation of any ore properties. In 1830 to 1849, the Ministry of Finance had been making significant efforts to introduce mechanical ore processing. Since 1830, ore pounding had been used, with the separation of sludge in gold washers. This method was justly criticized a few years later. The poor separation results were due to the impurities in the clay and to the application of the same separation method for different ores. Following his trip to the mountainous districts of Germany and Hungary, mining engineer Kovrigin opted for the use the Oberharz processing method in view of the similarity of the properties of the ores mined. In 1840–1853, the Kovrigin’s program was implemented for the processing of Nerchinsky District ores to produce silver and lead. As a result, 318 processing devices were then operated at 32 plants (compare with 93 devices at eight plants in 1830–1835). The article contains comprehensive statistics on the results of ore processing at the Nerchinsky Zavod plants.

1. Vedernikov V. V. Cabinet non-ferrous metallurgy of Siberia in the XVIII–first half of the XIX century. Barnaul: Altai State University, 2012. pp. 218–219.
2. Description of mechanical processing of lead ores of the Upper Harz. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1858. No. 2. p. 238.
3. Statement about the ores melted at all Nerchinsk plants and the silver obtained from them with the gold contained in it, from 1704 to 1836. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1836. No. 9. pp. 663–667.
4. State Archive of the Trans-Baikal Territory. Fund F-31. Inventory 1. Case 2323.
5. Wagenbreth O., Wächtler E. Bergbau im erzgebirge: Technische denkmale und geschichte. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 2012. 508 s.
6. Ließman W. Historischer bergbau im Harz: Ein kurzführer. Berlin: Springer, 2010. 470 s.
7. Filev E. K. About some mines of the Nerchinsky district and beneficiation of local ores. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1836. No. 11. p. 394.
8. Statement on the wet beneficiation of silver-lead ores in the Nerchinsky mining district for 1835. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1837. No. 2. p. 439.
9. Kovrigin I. N. On the improvement of ore beneficiation at the Nerchinsk plants. Gornyi Zhurnal. 1839. No. 9. p. 416.
10. State Archive of the Trans-Baikal Territory. Fund F-31. Inventory 1. Case 1197.
11. Dennert H. Bergbau und hüttenwesen im Harz vom 16. bis 19. jahrhundert dargestellt in lebensbildern führender persönlichkeiten. Pieper Verlag, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, 1986. 193 s.
12. Bartels Ch. Industrialisierung im Oberharzer bergbau 1750 bis 1913. Die Industrialisierung europäischer montanregionen im 19. jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002. ss. 19–58.
13. State Archive of the Trans-Baikal Territory. Fund F-31. Inventory 1. Case 2722.
14. State Archive of the Trans-Baikal Territory. Fund F-31. Inventory 1. Case 3712.