Название |
Feasibility study of underground access methods for the 50 Years of October Mine |
Информация об авторе |
Kazgiprotsvetmet Institute, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan:
V. K. Dorofeev, Chief Project Engineer
Russian Copper Company, Yekaterinburg, Russia: I. A. Altushkin, Chairman of the Board of Directors, info@rcc-group.ru A. I. Gordeev, Director of Mining Management, Candidate of Engineering Sciences V. A. Belov, Deputy Director of Underground Mining, Candidate of Engineering Sciences |
Реферат |
The authors solve the current research and production challenge, namely, selection of optimal access to reserves left under transition from open pit to underground mining. The problem is solved in terms of the 50 Years of October Mine, the Kazakhstan asset of the Russian Copper Company, Yekaterinburg. The scope of the feasibility study encompasses a few access scenarios: with motor transport in the whole route from the underground tunnels to the surface and with cage winding in shafts with different inside diameters. As a result of calculations of capital ad operating costs, with regard to ventilation conditions and construction period of the cage winding facility, the two-stage combination transport variant has been selected. At the first stage, ore reserves are extracted from pitwall rock mass at the upper levels of the deposit with ore haulage by underground dump truck via ramps with further re-loading to open pit dump trucks. Simultaneously with the first-stage mining, the cage winding facility is constructed for the second-stage extraction of ore reserves under open pit bottom, with ore hoist via the shaft with cage winding 6.5 m I diameter and using electromotive haulage on accumulation horizons. The accepted access scenario has accelerated extraction of ore reserves from pitwall rock mass and early mining of reserves under the pit bottom. |
Библиографический список |
1. Altushkin I. A., Cherepovitsyn A. E., Korol Yu. A. Implementation of the sustainable development mechanism in application to the establishment of a mining and metallurgical holding in the Russian copper industry. Moscow : «Ore and Metals» Publishing House, 2016. 232 p. 2. Litvinenko V. Advancement of geomechanics and geodynamics at the mineral ore mining and underground space development. Geomechanics and Geodynamics of Rock Masses : proceedings of the 2018 European Rock Mechanics Symposium. London : Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. Vol. 1. pp. 3–16. 3. Basov V. V., Serg A. G. Geomechanical assessment of intersection parameters in underground mines with regard to dynamic abutment pressure. Naukoemkie tekhnologii razrabotki i ispolzovaniya mineralnykh resursov. 2018. No. 4. pp. 117–121. 4. Tsirel S. V., Pavlovich A. A. Challenges and advancement in geomechanic al justification of pit wall designs. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 7. pp. 39–45. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.07.07 5. Belov V. A. geomechanical movements in rock mass as a source of stress state building. Sino-Russian Scientific-Technical Forum on Deep-Level Nonlinear Geomechanics–2018. Ekaterinburg–Perm, 2018. 6. Sokolov I. V., Antipin Yu. G. Framework of geotechnology strategy for transition zones in underground ore mining. Hybrid Geotechnology – Transition to a New Technological Mode : X International Conference Proceedings. Magnitogorsk, 2019. 7. Radchenko D. N. High-productive underground mineral mining clusters based on hybrid geotechnologies. Hybrid Geotechnology – Transition to a New Technological Mode : X International Conference Proceedings. Magnitogorsk, 2019. 8. Zvereva E. V. 3D modeling of access to stratified deposits. Nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii. 2011. Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 39–41. 9. Temporal rules for protection of structures and nature from adverse effect of underground base metal ore mining under conditions of unstudied process of rock mass movement. Leningrad, 1986. 76 p. 10. Wang N., Wan B. H., Zhang P., Du X. L. Analysis on deformation development of open-pit slope under the influence of underground mining. Legislation, Technology and Practice of Mine Land Reclamation : Proceedings of the Beijing International Symposium Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration. London : Taylor & Francis Group, 2015. pp. 53–58. 11. Trubetzkoy K. N., Kaplunov D. R., Chanturiya V. A. (Eds.). Complex mineral resources mining: The prospects of expansion Russia’s mineral raw material base. Moscow : IPKON RAN, 2009. 456 p. 12. Altushkin I. A., Korol Yu. A., Koshik A. A. Experience of mastering of «50 let Oktyabrya» copper sulphide deposit in the Repu blic of Kazakhstan. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2013. No. 5. pp. 85–88. 13. Altushkin I. A., Levin V. V., Korol Yu. A. Efficiency of governmental support of business in terms of investment projects implemented by the Russian Copper Company in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Gornyi zhurnal Kazakhstana. 2015. No 7. pp. 4–14. 14. Sokolov I. V., Antipin Yu. G., Smirnov A. A., Nikitin I. V., Baranovsky K. V. Selection of a minefield opening-up scenario in combined mining based on economic and mathematical modeling. GIAB. 2013. No. 9. pp. 357–362. 15. Sokolov I. V., Smirnov A. A., Antipin Yu. G., Baranovsky K. V., Rozhkov A. A. Optimal combination technology for high-grade quartz production based on modeling. Journal of Mining Science. 2016. Vol. 52, Iss. 6. pp. 1159–1167. 16. Demidov Yu. V., Zvonar’ A. Yu. Methodical principles of designing of opening schemes combined technology for developmen t of ore deposits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2009. No. 6. pp. 57–59. 17. Melnikov N. N., Fedorov S. G. Innovation project of the development of Oleny Ruchey deposit in the Khibiny mountain range. Eurasian Mining. 2011. No. 1. pp. 21–24. 18. Prakash A., John L. P., Pal R. P. Highwall mining in India. Part II. Subsidence management mechanism at mine level. Journal of Mines, Metals & Fuels. 2014. Vol. 62, No. 9-10. pp. 254–262. 19. Baotang Shen. Highwall Mining Stability. Project on Mine Disaster Prevention and Control : Taishan Academic Forum. Paris : Atlantis Press, 2014. Vol. 4. pp. 25–37. |