Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia:

Torosyan V. F., Associate Professor, Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, torosjaneno@mail.ru

Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia:
Torosyan E. S., Senior Lecturer
Lazareva A. N., Assistant

Modern vocational education for the training of students of mountain specialties has been given the task of improving the educational process in the direction of finding new technologies, methods, techniques, means and forms of education that will generally improve the quality of education of students. The training of highly qualified specialists for mining enterprises sets the technical university the task of introducing more efficient ways of organizing the educational process, improving the structure and content of natural-mathematical training of students. It is important to note that the informatization of modern society and the development of high technologies impose on graduates the requirements of professional growth and professional mobility. The article discusses the main characteristics and features of interactive methods and modeling, as effective ways of knowing when studying the disciplines of the natural-mathematical cycle by students of mining specialties. At the same time, the basis of the modeling is the mediating link - the model - the object – substitutes and the original object – the original. The basis of interactive methods is an empirical and theoretical combination in learning, aimed at forming an active, socially adapted personality that is able to effectively act, compete, compete and compete on the path to truth, while manifesting such a psychological phenomenon as infection, when a thought expressed by a neighbor, can cause its own, similar or opposite.

1. Stoff V. A. Models and perception. 1963.
2. Skvirskiy V. Ya. Instructional guidelines to structure educational information. Moscow : MADI, 1980. 80 p.
3. Earnest D., Amador J. Lesson planimation : prospective elementary teachers’ interactions with mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 2019. 22(1). pp. 37–68.
4. Torosyan V. F., Tishchenkova A. V. Personnel training for regional social and economic system as the mutually beneficial university-and-business interaction. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2012. No. 4(8).
pp. 84–90.
5. Frolov M. T. Epistemological problems of modeling, Moscow : Nauka, 1961.
6. Chernikova A. A., Petrov V. L. Training of mining engineers at the Russian research universities. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015. No. 8. pp. 103–106. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2015.08.22
7. Vinevskaya A. V. Case method in pedagogy. M.A. Puilova (Ed.). Rostov-on-Don : Feniks, 2015. 141 p.
8. Ustunel H., Keles F. Design of a touch sensation application including surface tension sample using a haptic device in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2019. Vol. 27(2). pp. 344–350.
9. Glushkov V. M. Epistemological nature of information modeling. Voprosy filosofii. 1963. No. 10. pp. 12–18.
10. Gurina R. V., Sokolova E. E. Frame representation of knowledge : Monograph. Moscow, 2005. 176 p.
11. Eretskiy M. I. Improvement of elementary vocational training. Moscow : Vysshaya shkola, 1987. 264 p.
12. Menekse M., Purzer S., Heo D. An investigation of verbal episodes that relate to individual and team performance in engineering student teams. International Journal of STEM Education. 2019. 6:7.
13. Barak M., Hussein-Farraj R. Integrating model-based learning and animations for enhancing students’ understanding of proteins structure and function. Research in Science Education. 2013. Vol. 43(2). pp. 619–636.
14. Erdniev P. M. Agglomeration of didactic units as educational technology. Moscow, 1992.
15. Erganova E. M. Professional education procedure : Teaching aid for university students. Moscow : Akademiya, 2007. 160 p.
16. Klaus G. Cybernetics and philosophy. Berlin, 1961.
17. Kopeina N. S. Teaching style as supportive tool of successful learning of students. Problems of academic performance enhancement and reduction in attrition rate. Leningrad : LGU, 1983. pp. 23–29.
18. Kuzmina N. V. Integrated research of pedagogical factors in academic performance. Ways of improving efficiency of university education. Didactic elements of special procedures. Gorky : GGU, 1980. 144 p.
19. Matyash N. V. Innovative pedagogical technologies. Project teaching : Teaching aid. Moscow : Akademiya, 2014. 160 p.
20. Nemov R. S. Psychology : Textbook for students of pedagogical universities. Moscow : VLADOS, 2001. Book 3 : Psychognosis. Introduction in scientific psychological research with elements of mathematical statistics. 640 p.
21.Sakharoova V. I., Khlupina N. O. (Collectors). Arrangement of self-training at professional education institutions. Kemerovo : GBU DPO KRIRPO, 2016. 126 p.
22. Pastukhova I. P., Tarasova N. V. Learning and exploratory activities of students : Elementaries. Moscow : Akademiya, 2014. 160 p.
23. Harran M., Theunissen H. W. Navigating the engineering literacy divide: design report collaboration practice realities. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. 2019. Vol. 17(1). pp. 77–101.
24. Torosyan F. F. Formation of cognitive self-dependence of students. Theses of Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences Dissertation. Kemerovo : KemGU, 2006. 192 p.
25. Torosyan V. F., Politsinskiy E. V., Sokolova S. V. Criteria and values of cognitive self-dependence assessment of technical university. GIAB. 2011. No. S2. pp. 439–448.