Журналы →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2017 →  №2 →  Назад

ANALYTICAL METHODS IN BENEFICIATION PROCESSES
Название Random sampling error experimental determination at processing plants
DOI 10.17580/or.2017.02.08
Автор Kozin V. Z., Komlev A. S.
Информация об авторе

Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Russia:

Kozin V. Z., Head of Chair, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor, gmf.dek@ursmu.ru
Komlev A. S., Engineer, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, tails2002@inbox.ru

Реферат

The procedure for experimental determination of random sampling errors is described in the GOST standard 14180—80. In compliance with this procedure, from an ore shipment (in accordance with the standard, to be processed per shift) it is necessary to select a series of spot samples with an interval smaller than correlation time, thus making combined samples A and B non-informational with respect to determination of sampling errors. In the limiting case, when selecting a large number of spot samples, difference between samples A and B may be so small, as to exclude a possibility of sampling error calculation, because sampling error, in accordance with the standard comprising both sampling and samples preparation errors, will reflect only samples preparation error. The procedure application experience leads to the conclusion that samples analysis error is greater or equal to sampling error, which is incompliant with sampling conditions at processing plants. Correlation time for mass fraction of analyzed ore component at processing plants is 4–6 hours. In order to provide for sampling intervals exceeding correlation time, sampling is proposed to be done in 24 hours, forming samples A and B from two-hour samples, shifted in twelve-hour interval, and comprised of a number of spot samples, adopted at the plant in question. This permits to implement experimental determination of sampling errors using routine samples at the plant. A rational alternative for determination of sampling errors without forming samples A and B is proposed, completely complying with routine sampling at the plant. It consists in using routine replicate analyses for analysis error calculation, analytic formula of samples preparation scheme and routine sampling results’ variance calculation errors, completely avoiding the necessity for performance of special experiments.

Ключевые слова Random sampling errors, combined sampling plan, alternative experiments
Библиографический список

1. Kozin V. Z. Minerals raw material sampling. Ekaterinburg: Publ. UGGU, 2011. 316 p.
2. Cleary P. W., Robinson G. K. Sampling of cohesive bulk materials by falling stream cutters. Chemical Engineering Science. 2011. Vol. 66, Iss. 17. pp. 3991–4003.
3. Mucha J., Szuwarzysk M. Sampling errors and their influence on accuracy of zinc and lead content evaluation in ore from the Trzebionka mine (Silesian–Cracow Zn–Pb ore district, Poland). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2004. Vol. 74, Iss. 1. pp. 165–170.
4. Reddi G. S., Rao C. R. M. Analytical techniques for the determination of precious metals in geological and related materials. Analyst. 1999. Vol. 124. pp. 1531–1540.
5. Adams M. D. Summary of gold plants and processers. Advances in gold ore processing. Ed. M. D. Adams. 2005. Chap. 41. pp. 994–1013.
6. Alimov Yu. I., Shayevich A. B. Methodological features of assessing the results of quantitative chemical analysis. Zhurnal Analiticheskoy Khimii. 1988. No. 10. pp. 1893–1916.
7. GOST 14180—80. Ores and concentrates of non-ferrous metals. Methods for selection and preparation of samples for chemical analysis and moisture determination. Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov. 27 p.
8. GOST 11.004—74. Applied statistics. Rules for determining estimates and confidence limits for the parameters of a normal distribution. Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov. 16 p.
9. Karpenko N. V. Sampling and quality control of ore dressing products. Moscow: Nedra, 1987. 216 p.
10. Kogan G. N. Application of variance analysis method for estimation of the errors in the process of reduction of samples containing noble metals. Obogashchenie Rud. 1975. No. 6. pp. 36–38.
11. Glazatov А. N., Tsemekhman L. Sh., Spitsyn N. K., Kazakov А. М., Novikov М. N., Sokolov S. V. The OAO Kolskaya Mine-and-Mill Concentrating Plant classification section overflow sampling methods improvement. Obogashchenie Rud. 2010. No. 3. pp. 35–38.
12. Barskiy L. A., Kozin V. Z. System analysis in mineral processing. Moscow: Nedra, 1978. 486 p.
13. Kozin V. Z., Komlev A. S. Upon development of an up-to-date ore and processing products sampling standard. Obogashchenie Rud. 2016. No. 2. pp. 27–32.
14. Karatayeva A. V., Verkhorubova A. V., Semenovykh N. V. Calculation of the error of sampling copper concentrate in the technological scheme of the Tarnier field copper-zinc ore processing at OJSC Svyatogor. Scientific bases and practice of ores and technogenic raw materials processing. Proc. of the International scientific-technical conf. Ekaterinburg: Publ. «Fort Dialog-Icet’», 2009. pp. 65–71.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад