Журналы →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  №12 →  Назад

GEOLOGY AND EXPLORATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITS
Название Gold-tourmaline mineralization in carbonaceous shales of the Kumak deposit (South Ural)
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.12.02
Автор Kolomoets A. V., Snachev A. V., Rassomakhin M. A.
Информация об авторе

Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia:

A. V. Kolomoets, Senior Lecturer, kolomoyets56@mail.ru

 

Institute of Geology, Ufa Federal Research Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia:

A. V. Snachev, Head of a Laboratory, Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences

 

Institute of Mineralogy, South Ural Federal Science Center for Mineralogy and Geoecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miass, Russia:

M. A. Rassomakhin, Junior Research

Реферат

The article discusses the geological structure of the Kumak gold ore deposit, confined to the Early Carboniferous Anikhov graben of the East Ural uplift. It is composed of sericite-quartz-carbon and quartz-carbon-tourmaline schists of the Bredy Formation (C1bd). Black shale deposits are carbonaceous type and belong to terrigenous-carbonaceous and silicon-carbonaceous formations. Among the main minerals in shales are noted: quartz, sericite, carbonates, sulfides, tourmaline and carbonaceous matter. The field is characterized by a wide variety of gold ore mineralization. Rich ore zones are noted at the intersection of the East Anikhov faults oriented in the north–south direction and the branching tensile fractures in the north-north-east and north-west directions. In the ore mineral association prevailing here, finely dispersed gold is associated with small crystals of pyrite, arsenopyrite and concentrates nearby abundant tourmaline areas. The fine intergrowth of tourmaline and gold indicates the synchronism of their formation and allows us to distinguish a quartz-tourmaline gold ore formation within the Kumak deposit, comparable with a number of objects in East Transbaikal and Tuva. The most probable source of tourmaline mineralization in sericite-quartz-carbon schists could be metamorphically transformed boron-containing marine sediments saturated with clay particles and Corg. The microprobe study of gold grains taken from carbonaceous shales and weathering crusts made it possible to attribute them to the high-grade (919–1000) type, which is the leading one in the gold ore mineralization of the considered deposit. It is established that in the zone of hypergenesis, gold grains are not homogeneous. Here, secondary redeposition of gold takes place in the form of small spongy high-grade aggregates, as well as the formation of a rim on some grains with clear signs of refinement and purification from impurity elements.
The geological works were carried out under State Contract No. 0246-2019-0078. The analyses were supported by the regional Grant for Science and R&D, Agreement No. 23 dated August 18, 2019. The studies into gold composition were executed in the framework of state-financed scientific topic No. AAAA-A19-119072390050-9.
The authors express thanks to S. A. Yagudin for the analysis implementation and to E. O. Kalistratov for the help in description of polished sections. Further thanks are extended to R. S. Kisil and V. S. Panteleev for the help in the field works.

Ключевые слова Southern Urals, carbon shales, black shales, noble metals, gold, silver, tourmaline, boron
Библиографический список

1. Ermolaev N. P., Sozinov N. A. Stratiform mineralization in black shales. Moscow : Nauka, 1986. 172 p.
2. Rykus M. V., Shachev V. I., Kuznetsov N. S., Savelev D. E., Bazhin E. A., Shachev A. V. Ore mineralization of dunite-harzburgite and black shale formations in a transitional area between the South and Middle urals. Neftegazovoe delo. 2009. Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 17–27.
3. Snachev A. V., Rykus M. V., Snachev M. V., Romanovskaya M. A. A model for the genesis of gold mineralization in carbonaceous schists of the Southern Urals. Moscow University Geology Bulletin. 2013. Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 108–117.
4. Shumilova T. G., Shevchuk S. S., Isayenko S. I. Metal concentrations and carbonaceous matter in the black shale type rocks of the urals. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2016. Vol. 469, No. 1. pp. 695–698.
5. Bespaev Kh. A., Parilov Yu. S., Rodnova V. I., Mukaeva A. E. Determination of gold ore in East Kazakhstan. Geologiya i okhrana nedr. 2017. No. 2. pp. 4–15.
6. Ivanov A. I. The role played by metamorphic transformation conditions of carbonaceous carbonateterrigene deposits for gold mineralization formation at various stages of collisional epoch of Baikal-Patom metallogenic province development. Otechestvennaya geologiya. 2017. No. 4. pp. 3–23.
7. Groves D. I., Goldfarb R. J., Robert F., Hart C. J. R. Gold Deposits in Metamorphic Belts: Overview of Current Understanding, Outstanding Problems, Future Research, and Exploration Significance. Economic Geology. 2003. Vol. 98, No. 1. pp. 1–29.
8. Large R. R., Bull S. W., Maslennikov V. V. A Carbonaceous Sedimentary Source-Rock Model for Carlin-Type and Orogenic Gold Deposits. Economic Geology. 2011. Vol. 106, No. 3. pp. 331–358.
9. Groves D. I., Santosh M., Goldfarb R. J., Liang Zhang. Structural geometry of orogenic gold deposits: Implications for exploration of world-class and giant deposits. Geoscience Frontiers. 2018. Vol. 9, Iss. 4. pp. 1163–1177.
10. Gadd M. G., Peter J. M., Jackson S. E., Zhaoping Yang, Petts D. Platinum, Pd, Mo, Au and Re deportment in hyper-enriched black shale Ni-Zn-Mo-PGE mineralization, Peel River, Yukon, Canada. Ore Geology Reviews. 2019. Vol. 107. pp. 600–614.
11. Bilibina T. V., Bogdanov Yu. V. Gold forecasts in the Mugodzhar Range. Geologiya rudnykh mestorozhdeniy. 1959. No. 5. pp. 104–111.
12. Albov M. N. Secondary zonality in gold deposits in the Urals. Moscow : Gosgeoltekhizdat, 1960. 215 p.
13. Voin M. I. Features of structure and mineralization in the Kumak ore field and the detection procedure of rich pay zones in crushed veins. Izvestiya vuzov. Geologiya i razvedka. 1966. No. 11. pp. 77–86.
14. Rudskoy V. G. Role of metamorphism in gold mineralization in the Kumak ore field. Geology of Metamorphic Complexes : Inter-University Scientific Subject Collection. Sverdlovsk : SGI, 1982. pp. 88–94.
15. Loshchinin V. P., Pankratev P. V. Gold in the Low to Middle Paleozoic black shale formations in Eastern Orenburg area. Georesource Development Strategies and Processes : Proceedings of Annual Session on 2005 R&D of the Mining Institute, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences. Perm : Gornyi institut UrO RAN, 2006. pp. 79–82.
16. Sazonov V. N., Koroteev V. A., Ogorodnikov V. N., Polenov Yu. A., Velikanov A. Ya. Gold in “black shales” of the Urals. Litosfera. 2011. No. 4. pp. 70–92.
17. Novgorodova M. I., Yakobs E. I., Shinkarenko Yu. G. Gold mineralization and metasomatic ore in an area in South Ura. Ural’s Petrology and Metallogeny : The Fourth Ural Petrographic Conference Proceedings. Sverdlovsk : UNTs AN SSSR, 1981. pp. 115–116.
18. Lyadskiy P. V., Chen-Len-Son B. I., Kvasnyuk L. N., Alekseeva G. A., Olenitsa T. V., Manuylov N. V. State geological map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:200 000. 2nd Edition. Series South Ural. Sheet M-41-VII(XIII) (Svetly). Explanatory note. Moscow MF FGBU VSEGEI, 2018. 128 p.
19. Yudovich Ya. E., Ketris M. P. Geochemistry of black shales. Moscow, Berlin : Direkt-Media, 2015. 272 p.
20. Kolomoets A. V., Snachev A. V. Geology and petrogeochemical features of the Kumak ore field carbon deposits. Protsessy v geosredakh. 2020. No. 1(23). pp. 586–593.
21. Kolomoets A. V. Conditions of Kumakskoye deposit generation of black shale formation (Orenburg region). Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 28–35.
22. Znamenskiy S. E., Znavemnkaya N. M. Classification of gold deposits on the eastern shoulder of the Southern Ural. Geological Digest. Ufa : Institut geologii UNTs RAN, 2009. No. 8. pp. 177–186.
23. Kuzhuget R. V., Zaykov V. V., Lebedev V. I. Ulug–Sair gold–tourmaline–quartz deposit, West Tyva. Litosfera. 2014. No. 2. pp. 99–114.
24. Gvozdev V. I., Grebennikova A. A., Vakh A. S., Fedoseev D. G., Goryachev N. A. Mineral evolution during formation of gold–rare-metal ores in the Sredne-Golgotay deposit (Eastern Transbaikalia). Russian Journal of Pacific Geology. 2020. Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 66–86.
25. Cabral A. R., Tupinambá M., Zeh A., Lehmann B., Wiedenbeck M. et al. Platiniferous gold-tourmaline aggregates in the gold-palladium belt of Minas Gerais, Brazil : implications for regional boron metasomatism. Mineralogy and Petrology. 2017. Vol. 111, Iss. 6. pp. 807–819.
26. Sokol E. V., Kokh S. N., Kozmenko O. A., Lavrushin V. Yu, Belogub E. V. et al. Boron in an onshore mud volcanic environment: Case study from the Kerch Peninsula, the Caucasus continental collision zone. Chemical Geology. 2019. Vol. 525. pp. 58–81.
27. Rassomakhin M. A., Belogub E. V., Novoselov K. A., Khvorov P. V. Tourmaline from late quartz veins of the Murtykty gold deposit, Republic of Bashkortostan. Mineralogiya. 2020. No. 6(1). pp. 69–83.
28. Petrovskaya N. V. Free gold : General characteristic, typomorphism, genesis. Moscow : Nauka, 1973. 347 p.
29. Muzin V. V., Malyugin A. A. Gold typomorphism in hypergenesis zones : A case-study of the Urals. Sverdlovsk : UNTs AN SSSR, 1987. 96 p.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад