Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  #1 →  Back

APPLIED RESEARCHES
ArticleName Rock bolting design and justification for rib pillars of large cross-section and extension
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.01.13
ArticleAuthor Eremenko V. A.
ArticleAuthorData

College of Mining, NUST MISIS, Moscow, Russia:

V. A. Eremenko, Director of Research Center for Applied Geomechanics and Convergent Technologies in Mining, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, prof.eremenko@gmail.com

Abstract

The presented research findings are aimed to justify feasibility of reinforcement of deformable rib pillars in a salt mine by rock bolts with determination of the rockbolting pattern characteristics towards geomechanical stability of the mine for a period of 2018–2032. The rock mass quality calculated by Barton’s classification for a salt rock mass subjected to mining with blasting in the last century makes Q’ = 39, which means the rock mass is unbroken and stable. The roof in the stopes extracted 40–50 years ago is stable; detachment of rocks is observed at the bottom of the rib pillar to a depth to 0.5–2 m from the exposure and to a height of 0.5–5 m from the floor; local damages are accompanied with separate rock falls; it is allowed to leave the exposures unsupported. Based on the numerical stress–strain analysis of the rib pillar, given extraction of all stopes on three levels, it is found that: the minimum strength factor of the rib pillar is SF = 2.3; the maximal principal stress σ1 in the rib pillar v ries as 6.7 to 7.6 MPa (at the top), as 7 to 9 MPa (in the middle), as 7.2 to 8.1 MPa (at the bottom), as 9.4 to 12.2 MPa (in the bottom edges—maximal values) and is less than the maximal allowable stresses for rock salt; the minimal principal stress σ3 in the stope walls) ranges from 2.6 to 3.9 MPa (at the pillar top), from 0.1 to 3.1 MPa (in the middle of the pillar), from 2.9 to 4.2 MPa (at the pillar bottom) from 1.4 to 2.1 MPa (in the bottom edges of the rib pillar—maximal values) and is reflective on no intensive stress relaxation (potential stratification of wall rocks). The initial variant of the support design for the rib pillar assumed cable bolting. The implemented analysis revealed considerable disadvantages under the specific geomechanical and geotechnical conditions; inconvenience or impossibility of cable bolting to the required distance in the inclined boreholes as well as anchorage on the stope exposures (head of the bolts) because of the prohibited entrance in the stopes by the safety procedures; unattainability of the wanted yielding in view of the rib pillar deformation in the course of stoping (cable bolt rupture); high corrosive impact on strength characteristics of cable bolts. For the rib pillar, a special elastoplastic support system has been designed, including anchor bolts, hightensile MINEX mesh and friction bolts.
The author appreciates participation of R. V. Gramm, Technical Officer, Russol; D. V. Druzhkin, Director of the Sol-Iletsk Mine; RANK 2, Geobrugg and UralEnergoResurs companies, P. V. Volkov, Associate Professor of the Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University; M. A. Kosyreva, A. R. Umarov, A. M.Yanbekov and Ch. V. Khazhyylai, fellows of the Research Center for Applied Geomechanics and Convergent Technologies in Mining at the NUST MISIS’ College of Mining in this study.

keywords Rock salt, numerical modeling, stresses, strains, rock mass behavior, quantitative and qualitative estimate, jointing, stope, extraction, rib pillar, rock bolting, high-tensile mesh, Q-index, Map3D software, Hoek–Brown strength criterion
References

1. Barton N. Application of Q-System and Index Tests to Estimate Shear Strength and Deformability of Rock Masses. Workshop on Norwegian Method of Tunneling. New Delhi, 1993. pp. 66–84.
2. Lushnikov V. N., Sandy M. P., Eremenko V. A., Kovalenko A. A., Ivanov I. A. Method of definition of the zone of rock massif failure range around mine workings and chambers by numerical modeling. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2013. No. 12. pp. 5–17.
3. Kosukhin N. I., Sidorov D. V., Shabarov A. N. Stress-strain state assessment in ore body mining in small-amplitude faulting zones. GIAB. 2014. No. 12. pp. 142–148.
4. Mian Sohail Akram, Muhammad Zeeshan. Rock Mass Characterization and Support Assessment along Power Tunnel of Hydropower in Kohistan Area, KPK, Pakistan. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 2018. Vol. 91, Iss. 2. pp. 221–226.
5. Oraee Kazem, Oraee Nikzad, Goodarzi Arash, Khajehpour Parham. Effect of discontinuities ch aracteristics on coal mine stability and sustainability: A rock fall prediction approach. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 26, Iss. 1. pp. 65–70.
6. Li Z., Gong H., Zhang Y., Li P. Fracture Development Law and Its Influence on the Stability of Surrounding Rock of a Power Station Underground Plant. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition). 2018. Vol. 48, No. 5. pp. 1574–1580.
7. Xiao H., Gong H., Liu W., Wang Y., Zhao K. Axis Direction Optimization of Underground Power Plant Under Complicated Fractured Rock Mass Environment. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences). 2018. Vol. 45. pp. 41–45.
8. Eremenko V. A., Barnov N. G., Kondratenko A. S., Timonin V. V. Method for mining steeply dipping thin lodes. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 12. pp. 45–50. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.12.10
9. Overview. Map3D, 2019. Available at: https://map3d.com/overview (accessed: 15.10.2019).
10. RocData. Rocscience, 2019. Available at: https://www.rocscience.com/software/rocdata (accessed: 15.10.2019).

11. Makarov A. B. Practical rock mechanics. Manual of mining engineers. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2006. 391 p.
12. Borshch-Komponiets V. I. Practical mechanics of rocks. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2013. 322 p.
13. Tsimbarevich P. M. (Ed.). Rock mechanics. Moscow : Ugletekhizdat, 1943. 184 p.
14. Slesarev V. D. Rock mechanics and mine support. Moscow : Ugletekhizdat, 1948. 303 p.
15. Potvin Y., Wesseloo J. Towards an understanding of dynamic demand on ground support. The Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2013. Vol. 113, Iss. 12. pp. 913–922.
16. Louchnikov V. N., Eremenko V. A., Sandy M. P. Ground support liners for underground mines: energy absorption capacities and costs. Eurasian Mining. 2014. No. 1. pp. 54–62.
17. Barinov A. Yu., Eremenko V. A., Filatov A. G., Bazin A. A. Pilot trials of high-tensile MINAX mesh as surface support in Kirov and Taimyr mines. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2019. No. 1. pp. 22–27. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2019.01.05
18. Kalmykov V. N., Latkin V. V., Zubkov A. A., Neugomonov S. S., Volkov P. V. The feature of construction increased combined fix on underground mines. GIAB. 2015. Special issue 15. Sustainable Performance Conditions for Mineral Resources Sector of Russia. Iss. 3. pp. 63–69.
19. Neugomonov S. S., Volkov P. V., Zhirnov A. A. Tunnel support in weak rocks using self-fastening rock bolts SZA. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018. No. 2. pp. 31–34. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.02.04
20. Kalmykov V. N., Volkov P. V., Latkin V. V. Validation of fiber-reinforced polymer rock bolt system design during pilot testing the Safyanov Mine. Aktualnye problemy gornogo dela. 2016. No. 2. pp. 27–35.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back