Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  #1 →  Back

THEORETICAL ISSUES OF GEOMECHANICS
ArticleName Identification of rock mass jointing parameters in geological models in modern geoinformation systems (in terms of Micromine)
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.01.07
ArticleAuthor Sergunin M. P., Darbinyan T. P.
ArticleAuthorData

Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division, Norilsk, Russia:

M. P. Sergunin, Head of Department for Geotechnical Supervision of Mining at the Center for Geodynamic Safety, SerguninMP@nornik.ru
T. P. Darbinyan, Director of Mining Practice Department

Abstract

The article describes the method of collecting large bulk of data on rock mass jointing in the Talnakh and Oktyabrsky deposits developed by the Polar Division of Norilsk Nickel. The method is based on processing of 3D triangulation faulting frames constructed in the geoinformation environment Micromine. This trend is selected because of the current storage of the majority of geological and surveying data collected by Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division in geoinformation packages in the form of 3D models; for this reason, the correct retrieval of the data for the interpretation and analysis is of the current concern. Furthermore, the model data amount and quality is sufficient for the more exact solution of the main geotechnical problems since the final geological models use data obtained from the exploration beginning and down to recent times; moreover the geological models are promptly updated as new data are acquired. The export of the data on jointing from the geological models is implemented automatically in view of the large quantity of computational operations. To this effect, the dedicated program is written in the Python language to extract the required information from the triangulation frames and to mark it with auxiliary data. All in all, processing of the tectonic faulting frames produced the array composed of more than 206 thousand records. Later on, the information was used to illustrate the variation in rock mass jointing in the Talnakh and Oktyabrsky deposits with depth. The analysis was carried out after depth-wise filtration of the initial data in the special Rocscience Dips software representing the data on jointing in the form of standard stereographic projections. Finally, the article offers some case-studies on application of the available data on rock mass jointing to solving specific geotechnical problems.

keywords Jointing, joint sets, kinematic analysis, movement, Dips software, Unwedge, Micromine
References

1. Basargin A. A. Modeling of ore mineral deposits using Mocromine GIS. Interexpo GEO-Sibir. 2016. Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 151–155.
2. Kurlenya M. V., Seryakov V. M., Eremenko A. A. Anthropogenic geomechanics stress fields. Novosibirsk : Nauka, 2005. 264 p.
3. Petukhov I. M., Egorov P. V., Vinokur B. Sh. Prevention of rock bumps in mines. Moscow : Nedra, 1984. 230 p.
4. Uskov V. A., Eremenko A. A., Darbinyan T. P., Marysyuk V. P. Geodynamic Hazard Assessment for Tectonic Structures in Underground Mining of North Ore Bodies in the Oktyabrsky Deposit. Journal of Mining Science. 2019. Vol. 55, Iss. 1. pp. 77–87.
5. Rats M. V., Chernyshev S. N. Jointing and the properties of jointed rocks. Moscow : Nedra, 1970. 159 p.
6. Sergunin M. P., Eremenko V. A. Determining parameters of original stress field in rock mass in Zapolyarny mine. GIAB. 2019. No. 4. pp. 63–74.
7. Dong Hyun Kim, Gratchev I., Balasubramaniam A. Back analysis of a natural jointed rock slope based on the photogrammetry method. Landslides. 2015. Vol. 12, Iss. 1. pp. 147–154.
8. Mehdi Amini, Abbas Majdi, Mohammad Amin Veshadi. Stability Analysis of Rock Slopes Against Block-Flexure Toppling Failure. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2012. Vol. 45, Iss. 4. pp. 519–532.
9. Wanna Phyo, Yew Mun Cheong, Kyi Khin, Aung Khaing, Kyaw Thu Myint. Geological rock face mapping and kinematics analysis for drill and blast excavation. 2014. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275016547 (accessed: 14.06.2019).
10. Contreras L.-F., Brown E. T. Slope reliability and back analysis of failure with geotechnical parameters estimated using Bayesian inference. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2019. Vol. 11, Iss. 3. pp. 628–643.
11. Sergunin M.P., Eremenko V. A. Learning of neural network to predict overlying rock mass displacement parameters by the data on jointing in terms of the Zapolyarny Mine. GIAB. 2019. No. 10. pp. 106–116.
12. Goodman R. E. Methods of Geological Engineering in Discontinuous Rocks. St. Paul : West Publishing Co., 1976. 472 p.
13. Goodman R. E. Block theory and its application to rock engineering. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall, 1985. 338 p.
14. Kosyreva M. A., Eremenko V. A., Gorbunova N. N., Tereshin A. A. Support design using Unwedge software for mines of Nornickel’s Polar Division. GIAB. 2019. No. 8. pp. 57–64.
15. Fithriyani Fauziyyah, Ryan Pratama, Zufialdi Zakaria. Viability Index Method for Wedge Analysis in Gudang Handak Underground Mine PT. Antam Tbk. 2015. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282971836 (accessed: 14.06.2019).
16. Riadh Boukarm, Abdelkader Houam, Mohamed Fredj, Rima Boucif. Modelling and Analysis of the Excavation Phase by the Theory of Blocks Method of Tunnel 4 Kherrata Gorge, Algeria. World Multidisciplinary Earth Sciences Symposium. Prague, 2017.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back