Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  #1 →  Back

THEORETICAL ISSUES OF GEOMECHANICS
ArticleName Paradoxes of strength and brittleness of rocks at seismic depths
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.01.02
ArticleAuthor Tarasov B. G.
ArticleAuthorData

Far East Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia:

B. G. Tarasov, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, bgtaras@gmail.com

Abstract

The present models of deep-focus earthquakes and rock bursts rest upon the modern views of brittle rock fracture under conditions of non-equicomponent triaxial compression at seismic depths. Spontaneous macroscopic fracture can only develop beyond the ultimate stress limit. Thus, reliable information on post-limiting fracture mechanism and properties is critical for the appropriate understanding of dynamic phenomena. It is thought today that post-limiting fracture at any lateral pressure takes place in the stress range between the limit strength and residual strength governed by friction (static or dynamic) between fracture surfaces, and the residual strength is considered as the minimum strength of rocks. These basic conditions are included in all current models of dynamic processes. Yet this article demonstrates that strong rocks at seismic depths under conditions of high triaxial compression and at the time of post-limiting fracture exhibit anomalously low strength which can be low than residual strength by an order of magnitude. The strength reduction is accompanied by the anomalous increase in brittleness which can be tens times higher than brittleness under uniaxial compression. The combination of these properties makes the process of fracturing extremely violent and unpreventable, thus preventing disclosure of the true strength and brittleness characteristics of rocks in the post-limiting domain so far. The discovery of anomalous properties of high-strength rocks unveils new opportunities for getting a deeper insight into the real causes of deep-focus earthquakes and rock bursts.
The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Grant No. RFMEFI58418X0034.

keywords Rocks, strength, brittleness, theoretical and experimental research, Earth’s crust, seismic depths, shear fractures
References

1. Cook N. G. W. The failure of rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1965. Vol. 2, Iss. 4. pp. 389–403.
2. Petukhov I. M., Linkov A. M. Mechanic of rock bumps and discharges. Moscow : Nedra, 1983. 279 p.
3. Stavrogin A. N., Tarasov B. G. Experimental physics and mechanics of rocks. Saint-Petersburg : Nauka, 2001. 342 p.
4. Brace W. F., Byerlee J. D. Stick-Slip as a Mechanism for Earthquakes. Science. 1966. Vol. 153, Iss. 3739. pp. 990–992.
5. Yehuda Ben-Zion. Dynamic ruptures in recent models of earthquake faults. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 2001. Vol. 49, Iss. 9. pp. 2209–2244.
6. Archuleta R. J. Analysis of near-source static and dynamic measurements from the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 1982. Vol. 72, No. 6A. pp. 1927–1956.
7. Brown S. R. Frictional heating on faults: Stable sliding versus stick slip. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 1998. Vol. 103, No. B4. pp. 7413–7420.
8. Lachenbruch A. H. Frictional Heating, Fluid Pressure, and the Resistance to Fault Motion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 1980. Vol. 85, No. B11. pp. 6097–6112.
9. Kostrov B. V. Focal mechanics of tectonic earthquake. Moscow : Nauka, 1975. 176 p.
10. Sobolev G. A. Physics of seismic process and prediction of earthquakes. Geophysics at the turn of the century : Collected papers. Moscow : OIFZ RAN, 1999. pp. 70–79.
11. Kochkin B. T., Petrov V. A. Long-term prediction for seismic hazard for radioactive waste disposal. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2015. Vol. 56, Iss. 7. pp. 1074–1082.
12. Scholz C. H. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting. 3rd ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018. 519 p.
13. Rebetsky Yu. L., Lukk A. A., Tatevossian R. E., Bykova V. V. Determination of weak earthquake focal mechanisms and modern geodynamics of Southern Iran. Geodinamika i tektonofizika. 2017. Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 971–988.
14. Tarasov B. G. Shear ruptures of extreme dynamics in laboratory and natural conditions. Deep Mining 2017 : Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2017. pp. 3–50.
15. Tarasov B., Potvin Y. Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science. 2013. Vol. 59. pp. 57–69.
16. Wawersik W. R., Fairhurst C. A study of brittle rock fracture in laboratory compression experiment. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts. 1970. Vol. 7, Iss. 5. pp. 561–564.
17. Tarasov B. G. Hitherto unknown shear rupture mechanism as a source of instability in intact hard rocks at highly confined compression. Tectonophysics. 2014. Vol. 621. pp. 69–84.
18. Reches Z., Lockner D. A. Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 1994. Vol. 99, No. B9. pp. 159–173.
19. Xinglin Lei, Kinichiro Kusunose, Rao M. V. M. S., Osamu Nishizawa, Takashi Satoh. Quasi-static fault growth and cracking in homogeneous brittle rock under triaxial compression using acoustic emission monitoring. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2000. Vol. 105, No. B3. pp. 6127–6139.
20. Wang Yu. Mw 6.9 Earthquake Strikes off the Coast of Fukushima, Japan. Earth Observatory of Singapore. 2016. Available at: https://earthobservatory.sg/news/mw-69-earthquake-strikescoast-fukushima-japan (accessed: 15.10.2019).
21. Ortlepp W. D. Rock Fracture and Rockbursts: An Illustrative Study. Series M9. Johannesburg : The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1997. 98 p.
22. Eremenko V. A., Louchnikov V. N., Sandy M. P., Shelukhin I. S. Evaluation of roof conditions in roomand-pillar mining in permafrost zone. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015. No. 3. pp. 24–32. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2015.03.04
23. Cheskidov V. V., Lipina A. V., Melnichenko I. A. Integrated monitoring of engineering structures in mining. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 2. pp. 18–21. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.02.05
24. Louchnikov V. N., Eremenko V. A., Sandy M. P. Ground support liners for underground mines: energy absorption capacities and costs. Eurasian Mining. 2014. No. 1. pp. 54–62.
25. Eremenko V. A., Neguritsa D. L. Efficient and active monitoring of stresses and strains in rock masses. Eurasian Mining. 2016. No. 1. pp. 21–24. DOI: 10.17580/em.2016.01.02

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back