Journals →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2019 →  #6 →  Back

BENEFICIATION PROCESSES
ArticleName Improving magnetite concentrate quality in an alternating magnetic field
DOI 10.17580/or.2019.06.04
ArticleAuthor Pelevin A. E.
ArticleAuthorData

Ural State Mining University (Ekaterinburg, Russia):

Pelevin A. E., Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Assistant Professor, a-pelevin@yandex.ru

Abstract

One of the promising methods for improving the quality of magnetite concentrate is its processing in a high-frequency alternating magnetic field, when magnetite particles are subjected to alternating processes of demagnetization and magnetization. This leads to the removal of rock particles from the floccules and higher magnetite mass fractions in the concentrate. The studies were completed using laboratory drum separators for wet and dry processing with a rotating magnetic system. In order to improve the concentrate quality at Vysokogorsky GOK, circuits with and without grinding were tested. The use of magnetic separation in an alternating magnetic field enabled improving the mass fraction of iron in the concentrate by 4.12 % (without grinding) and 5.68 % (with grinding). An increase in the frequency of the alternating magnetic field from 80 to 200 Hz resulted in an increase in the mass fraction of iron in the concentrate from 66.6 to 68.0 % in the circuit with additional concentrate grinding. The performance of a drum separator with a traveling magnetic field decreases with higher frequencies of the alternating magnetic field. This is due to a decrease in the velocity with which the magnetic particles recovered are transported to the concentrate discharge zone. Higher sizes of particles processed require lower alternating magnetic field frequencies. For the ore of the Sutarskoe deposit, the use of separation in an alternating magnetic field rendered high-grade magnetite concentrate with the mass fraction of iron of 69.9 % and silicon dioxide of 2.5 %, suitable for the metallization process. Material processing in an alternating magnetic field allows reducing the mass fraction of harmful impurities in the concentrate. In the processing of sulfide magnetite ore, the mass fraction of sulfur in the concentrate was reduced from 2.71 to 0.92 %.

keywords Magnetite concentrate, magnetite flocculus, alternating magnetic field, field frequency, drum separator, mass fraction of iron, particle size
References

1. Pelevin А. Е. Magnetic and electrical beneficiation methods. Magnetic beneficiation methods. Ekaterinburg: UGGU (USMU), 2018. 296 p.
2. Vaisberg L. A., Dmitriev S. V., Mezenin A. O. Controllable magnetic anomalies in mineral processing technologies. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 10. pp. 26–32. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.10.06.
3. Pelevin А. Е. Ways of efficiency increasing of iron ore raw materials concentration technology. Chernaya Metallurgiya. Byulleten’ Nauchno-Tekhnicheskoy i Ekonomicheskoy Informatsii. 2019. Vol. 75, No. 2. pp. 137–146.
4. Collinao E., Davila P., Irarrazabal R., de Carvalho R., Tavares M. Continuous improvement in SAG mill liner design using new technologies. XXVII International mineral processing congress. Santiago, Chile, 2014. Chap. 8. pp. 104–118.
5. Rosa A. C., de Oliveira P. S., Donda J. D. Comparing ball and vertical mills performance: An industrial case study. XXVII International mineral processing congress. Santiago, Chile, 2014. Chap. 8. pp. 44–52.
6. Jankovic A., Valery W., Sönmez B., Oliveira R. Effect of circulating load and classification efficiency on HPGR and ball mill capacity. XXVII International mineral processing congress. Santiago, Chile, 2014. Chap. 9. pp. 2–14.
7. Pivnyak G. G., Vaisberg L. A., Kirichenko V. I., Pilov P. I., Kirichenko V. V. Grinding. Energy and technology. Мoscow: Ruda i Metally, 2007. 296 p.
8. Sentemova V. A. Testing of flotation technology aimed at iron concentrates grade improvement. Obogashchenie Rud. 2009. No. 3. pp. 17–21.
9. Wanzhong Yin, Jizhen Wang, Longhua Xu. N reagents in the reverse flotation of carbonate-containing iron ores. Proc. of the 11th International сongress for applied mineralogy. Springer, 2015. pp. 459–470.
10. Vaisberg L. A., Korovnikov A. N. Fine screening as an alternative to hydraulic size classification. Obogashchenie Rud. 2004. No. 3. pp. 23–34.
11. Liamas-Bueno M., López-Valdivieso A., Corona-Arroyo M. A. On the mechanisms of silica (SiO2) recovery in magnetite ore low-magnetic-drum concentration. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration. 2019. Vol. 36. pp. 131–138.
12. Jiang Wen, Zhang Yimin. Development and application of complex flashing-field magnetic cleaner. XXVII International mineral processing congress. Santiago, Chile, 2014. Chap. 18. pp. 1–13.
13. Zvyagintsev А. G., Sentemova V. А. New method for magnetic separation of magnetite ores. Obogashchenie Rud. 2006. No. 5. pp. 20–22.
14. Pat. 2365421 Russian Federation.
15. Pat. 2366511 Russian Federation.
16. Karmazin V. V., Karmazin V. I. Magnetic, electrical and special methods for mineral processing. Vol. 1. Magnetic
and electrical methods for mineral processing. Мoscow: Gornaya Kniga, 2012. 672 p.
17. Derkach V. G. special methods for mineral processing. Мoscow: Nedra, 1966. 338 p.
18. Lomovtsev L. А., Nesterova N. А., Drobchenko L. А. Magnetic beneficiation of strong magnetic ores. Мoscow: Nedra, 1979. 235 p.
19. Karmazin V. V., Andreev V. G., Pozharskiy Yu. А. Improvement of technique and technology for stadial beneficiation of magnetite quartzites of Lebedinsky and Mikhaylovsky GOKs. Chernaya Metallurgiya. Byulleten’ Nauchno-Tekhnicheskoy i Ekonomicheskoy Informatsii. 2012. No. 3. pp. 26–33.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back