Journals →  Chernye Metally →  2018 →  #9 →  Back

Metrology and Standardization
ArticleName Metrological provision of correspondence evaluation for metallurgical products
ArticleAuthor O. I. Boriskin, D. I. Blagoveshchensky, G. A. Nuzhdin, E. I. Khunuzidi
ArticleAuthorData

Tula State University (Tula, Russia):

O. I. Boriskin, Dr. Eng., Prof., Head of the Chair of Instrumental and Metrological Systems, Director of Polytechnic Institute

 

State Regional Center for Standardization, Metrology and Testing in Tula Region (Tula, Russia):
D. I. Blagoveshchensky, Cand. Eng.

 

National University of Science and Technology “MISiS” (Moscow, Russia):
G. A. Nuzhdin, Cand. Eng., Associate Prof., e-mail: nuzhdin.65@mail.ru
E. I. Khunuzidi, Cand. Eng.

Abstract

The Concept of the Russian Federation national standardization system development until 2020 is implemented. According to this concept, standardization is one of the key factors influencing technological development of Russia. Among them the following are mentioned: atomic industry, heavy and transport mechanical engineering, aviation and shipbuilding industry. New developments, as well as new steel grades, have to come to the end with the proof that the set requirements are fulfilled. As such proof serves conformance assessment. The national standards on metallurgical production from ferrous metals and alloys which are put into operation for the last three years (after 01.01.2015) have been selected. Then all of them have been analyzed for conformance assessment metrological support improvement. For carrying out the analysis all three groups of the standards (129 documents) relating to metallurgical production from ferrous metals and alloys have been selected. 71 stan dards have been for the fi rst time enacted after 01.01.2015. 55 standards have been reconsidered and enacted after 01.01.2015. To three existing standards changes with date of introduction after 01.01.2015 have been accepted. In general according to all analyzed standards distribution of the regulated requirements in three last years rather uniform. Geometrical characteristics — 36%. Monitoring and test methods — 29%. Physical and chemical composition — 35%. It demonstrates a system integrated approach of national standardization to production from ferrous metals and alloys. It is analytically revealed that on the first place on number of the standards which are put into operation after 01.01.2015 establishing metallurgical production from ferrous metals and alloys monitoring and test methods there are spectral methods.

keywords Metrological support, ferrous metals and alloys, conformance assessment, standard, monitoring and test method, physical and chemical composition, geometrical characteristics
References

1. Rostekh is interested in cooperation with NITU “MISiS”. Available at http://misis.ru/university/news/science/2018-01/5147 (accessed: 24.03.2018).
2. GOST ISO/IEC 17000-2012. Conformity assessment. Vocabulary and general principles. Мoscow: Standartinform, 2014. 24 p.
3. Kiss I., Maksay S. Bimetallic cast iron rolls — some approaches to assure the exploitation properties. Tehnicki Vjesnik. 2010. Vol. 17, Iss. 2. pp. 173–178.
4. GOST ISO/IEC 17067-2015. Conformity assessment. Fundamentals of product certification and guidelines for product certification schemes. Moscow: Standartinform, 2016. 19 p.
5. Federal law dated 29.06.2015 No. 162-FZ (rev. 03.07.2016) «About standardization in Russian Federation».
6. Grin’ E. A., Anokhov A. E., Pchelintsev A. V., Krüger E.-T. Study of the structure and properties of metal of the major steam lines of a CCGT-420 unit made from high-chromium Х10CrMoVNb9-1 (P91) steel. Thermal Engineering. 2016. Vol. 63, Iss. 7. pp. 471–480.
7. Boriskin O. I., Blagoveshchensky D. I., Ezhova N. P., Nuzhdin G. A., Perminov A. S. Metrological provision of testing of magnetic materials. Chernye metally. 2017. No. 12. pp. 40–45.
8. R STsM-04-2017 Guide. Baritko N. V. et al. Interstate aviation committee. Aviation register. Мoscow: STs «Material», 2017. Iss. 6. 31 p.
9. Sun Z., Li L., Schnabel A., Reisner M., Fierlinger P., Stuiber S. Dynamic Modeling of the Behavior of Permalloy for Magnetic Shielding. Journal of Applied Physics. 2016. Vol. 119, Iss. 19. p. 193902.
10. Mitin O. N., Nuzhdin G. A., Nguen К. Kh. Modeling of tubular billet pressing with thinning. Izvestiya TulGU. Seriya Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2014. Iss. 5. pp. 57–65.
11. Levkov L. et al. Study of the effect of melting rate on electroslag remelted hollow steel billet quality. Metallurgist. 2014. Vol. 58, Iss. 7–8. pp. 677–683.
12. Mitin O. N., Nuzhdin G. A., Nguen К. Kh. Regularity of the influence of technological parameters on stress distribution heterogeneity on the part thickness during pressing thick-walled tubular billets. Izvestiya TulGU. Seriya Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2014. Iss. 6. pp. 46–53.
13. Hou Z., Zhang J., Liu D., Su F., Wang W., Yang C., Xu S. Effects of W Substitution on the Magnetic Properties, Phase Evolution and Microstructure of Rapidly Quenched Co80Zr18B2 Alloy. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 2014. Vol. 368. pp. 116–120.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back