Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2018 →  #6 →  Back

FROM THE OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MINING COMPANIES AND THE ORGANIZATIONS
MINING INSTITUTE, URAL BRANCH, RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
ArticleName Innovative methods for investigating technological properties and explosion/fire risk data of coal dust
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2018.06.09
ArticleAuthor Zhikharev S. Ya., Rodionov V. A., Pikhkonen L. V.
ArticleAuthorData

Mining Institute, Perm Federal Research Center, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Perm, Russia:

S. Ya. Zhikharev, Chief Researcher, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

 

Saint-Petersburg University of State Fire Service of EMERCOM of Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russia:
V. A. Rodionov, Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, 79213258397@mail.ru
L. V. Pikhkonen, Head of Chair, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Investigating coal dust infl ammation conditions resulting in many instances in explosions and disastrous effects requires close attention and innovative approaches involving advanced instrumental procedures and up-to-date research equipment. This article’s authors discuss the equipment (instruments and installations) which make it possible to obtain several characteristics both of technological properties and explosion/fire risk of coal dust in the tests and, thereby, to propose an integrated approach to the analysis of coal dust of different fineness. It is recommended to use up-to-date (innovative) methods of analyzing different-fineness coal dust samples. Such methods enable determination of technological properties and explosion/fire risk data of coal dust. In the article, a number of methods of synchronous thermal analysis are discussed: thermal gravimetric, differential thermogravimetric, differential thermal analysis and differential scanning calorimetry in various combinations of the first two methods with the third or the fourth. The first combination allows determining moisture, volatile yield and final ash content. In the second case, it is suggested to obtain fire risk data: temperatures of incomplete combustion, inflammation and spontaneous ignition. The experimental analysis of coal dust fire (explosion) data was carried out using a 20-l blasting chamber. The experimental research findings show that for the coal ranks currently produced in the Kuznetsk and Pechora Basins, the explosion/fire risk data, namely, maximum burst pressures and rates of increase in burst pressure are achieved at the coal dust concentration of 100 g/m3. For the tested ranks of the Kuznetsk and Pechora coal, the maximum burst pressure was 0.7–0.8 MPa and the rate of increase in burst pressure was 43–50 MPa/s, which implied high explosion/fire risk data of the coal dust samples. It was found that the most hazardous were the coal dust sample particles having fineness of 63–94 μm.

keywords Synchronous thermal analysis, coal dust, explosive dust, analysis sample, volatile yield, ash content, maximum burst pressure, rate of increase in burst pressure, explosion/fire risk data, technological parameters
References

1. Babkin V. A. Coal industry development in the Russian Federation using the example of the innovative territorial cluster “Integrated coal and industrial wastes processing” in the Kemerovo Region. Ugol. 2016. No. 3. pp. 50–52.
2. Coal Industry Supervision Department. Coal industry. Informatsionnyi byulleten Federalnoi sluzhby po ekologicheskomu, tekhnologicheskomu i atomnomu nadzoru. 2016. No. 4 (85). pp. 1–7.
3. Rodionov V. A., Pikhkonen L. V., Zhikharev S. Ya. Dispersion of the G-type coal dust of the Vorgashorskoe field and its influence on the thermal destruction process. Vestnik Permskogo nacionalnogo issledovatelskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiya. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo. 2017. Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 350–356.
4. Pilyaev N. A. Industrial Safety of the Enterprises of Mineral and Raw Complex in XXI Century. Occupational Safety in Industry. 2017. No. 1. pp. 82–87.
5. Rodionov V. A., Pikhkonen L. V., Zhiharev S. Ya. Analyzing application methods of thermal analysis for evaluation of explosive properties of Sokolovsky deposit coal. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2017. No. 3. pp. 84–93.
6. Zhou A., Wang K. Role of gas ventilation pressure on the stability of airway airflow in underground ventilation. Journal of Mining Science. 2018. Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 127–136.
7. Melody S. M., Johnston F. H. Coal mine fires and human health: What do we know? International Journal of Coal Geology. 2015. Vol. 152. pp. 1–14.
8. Karaoulis M., Revil A., Mao D. Localization of a coal seam fire using combined self-potential and resistivity data. International Journal of Coal Geology. 2014. Vol. 128–129. pp. 109–118.
9. Wang Y., Lu C., Zuo C. Coal mine safety production forewarning based on improved BP neural network. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2015. Vol. 25, Iss. 2. pp. 319–324.
10. Cloney C. T., Ripley R. C., Amyotte P. R., Khan F. I. Quantifying the effect of strong ignition sources on particle preconditioning and distribution in the 20-L chamber. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2013. Vol. 26, Iss. 6. pp. 1574–1582.
11. Kalyakin S. A. Analysis of the fire and explosion hazard of coal dust. Gornospasatelnoe delo. 2012. No. 1. pp. 27–35.
12. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902111644 (accessed: 10.09.2017)
13. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/499060050 (accessed: 10.09.2017)

14. Gordienko D. M., Vogman L. P., Gorshkov V. I., Shebeko Ju. N., Melihov A. S. et al. Ensuring fire safety of production objects. researches and development of normative documents of FGBU VNIIPO EMERCOM of Russia in the field of fires and explosions prevention. Occupational Safety in Industry. 2017. No. 6. pp. 5–20.
15. Pikhkonen L. V., Rodionov V. A., Zhiharev S. Y. Determination research of fire and explosion hazardous properties for hard coal at the Prokopyevsk coal field of the Leninsk-Kuznetsky coal field. Izvestiya Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Nauki o Zemle. 2017. No. 3. pp. 74–83.
16. Chernysheva Е. N. Coal moisture content as product quality indicator. Ugol. 2016. No. 8. pp. 125–128.
17. Maryandyshev P. A., Chernov A. A., Lyubov V. K. Thermogravimetric and kinetic investigations of peat and hydrolytic lignine. International Journal of Experimental Education. 2014. No. 12. pp. 20–27.
18. Brown M. E., Gallagher P. K. Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science, 2008. Vol. 5: Recent Advances, Techniques and Applications. 780 p.
19. Poletaev N. L. On the problem of experimental justification of low explosibility for dust/air mixture in the 20-l chamber. Fire and Explosion Safety. 2017. Vol. 26, No. 6. pp. 5–20.
20. Korolchenko A. Ya., Korolchenko D. A. Fire hazard of substances and materials and the extinguishing methods : Reference book. In two volumes. Second edition, revised and enlarged. Moscow : Assotsiatsiya Pozhnauka, 2004. 1487 p.

Full content Innovative methods for investigating technological properties and explosion/fire risk data of coal dust
Back