Journals →  Obogashchenie Rud →  2015 →  #4 →  Back

SECONDARY RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING
ArticleName Possibilities of quartz-feldspathic mineral material processing by means of photometric sorting by the example of the North Karelian deposits
DOI 10.17580/or.2015.04.10
ArticleAuthor Chertov А. N., Gorbunova E. V., Skamnitskaya L. S., Bubnova Т. P.
ArticleAuthorData

ITMO University (Russia):

Chertov А. N., Ph. D. in Engineering Sciences, Senior Researcher, a.n.chertov@mail.ru
Gorbunova E. V., Ph. D. in Engineering Sciences, Senior Researcher, gorbunova@grv.ifmo.ru

 

Institute of Geology, Karelian Research Centre (KRC) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) (Russia):
Skamnitskaya L. S., Senior Researcher, skamnits@krc.karelia.ru
Bubnova Т. P., Researcher, bubnova@krc.karelia.ru

Abstract

Possibilities of man-caused Karelian deposits rock mass material processing were studied, represented by the pit dumps of mica pegmatitic veins, mined since the beginning of the 20th century. The results of the Plotina and Hetolambino deposits dumps mineral material studies with respect to processing by means of photometric sorting are presented. The purpose of the studies was to establish objective (measurable) differences in specimens of quartz, plagioclase, microcline, biotite and muscovite that may be used in development of regimes and sequences of mineral separation from initial rock mass. As a result of the analysis of the above mineral specimens’ color parameters by means of HLS color schemes, it was established, that microcline may be separated from the general mix by H channel (color); the pair «quartz and plagioclase» — by L channel (lightness); biotite and muscovite mixture may be separated on the basis of H and S channels (hue-saturation-intensity); quartz and plagioclase are indistinguishable from each other by color. A characteristic attribute is proposed for separation of quartz and plagioclase, based on their difference in degree of translucency, as well as in inner and surface structures. On the basis of the conducted studies, a threestage flow sheet was developed for separation of minerals from man-caused dumps of the North Karelian mica and ceramic pegmatites. The consolidated feasibility analysis showed a high effectiveness of the proposed technology.

The work was performed with the partial state financial aid to the leading universities of the Russian Federation (the Government Order, Project No. 2014/190).

keywords Fieldspars, Karelia, quartz, plagioclase, microcline, biotite, muscovite, processing, photometric sorting, color analysis, color scheme, translucency, surface structure
References

1. Danilevskaya L. A., Skamnitskaya L. S., Shchiptsov V. V. Kvartsevoye syrye Karelii (Silica raw materials of Karelia). Petrozavodsk, KarNTs RAN (Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences), 2004, 226 p.
2. Skamnitskaya L. S., Bubnova T. P. Feldspathic raw materials of Karelian Republic: current status and prospects of development. Gornyi Zhurnal = Mining Journal, 2012, No. 5, pp. 25–29.
3. Yakhin V. G. Photoabsorption separation of quartz on the nature of light transmission. Obogashchenie Rud, 1986, No. 4, pp. 30–31.
4. Baybusinov Sh. Sh., Karelina I. N. Comparative cost-effectiveness of small-sized raw muscovite industrial using. Mineralnoye syrye Loukhskogo rayona Karelskoy ASSR (Minerals of Louhi region of Karelian ASSR), Petrozavodsk, 1991, pp. 116–128.
5. Kameneva E. E., Skamnitskaya L. S. Obogashcheniye mineralnogo syrya Karelii (Beneficiation of minerals of Karelia). Petrozavodsk, KarNTs RAN (Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences), 2003, 228 p.
6. Kobzev A. S., Alushkin I. V., Olkhovskiy A. M., Tolmachev G. F., Shilkin A. N. The results of pilot-scale testing of the Konevinskoye deposit gold-bearing ore preliminary beneficiation by photometric sorting. Obogashchenie Rud, 2014, No. 2, pp. 10–14.
7. Knapp H., Neubert K., Schropp C., Wotruba H. Viable applications of sensor-based sorting for the processing of mineral resources. ChemBioEng Reviews, 2014, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 86–95.
8. Sedelnikova G. V., Romanchuk A. I. Photometric separation: effective technique of preliminary ore concentration of large deposits. Razvedka i Okhrana Nedr = Prospect and Protection of Mineral Resources, 2011, No. 6, pp. 97–99.
9. Dehler M. Optical sorting of quartz gravel to reduce the iron content. Aufbereitungs Technik, 2006, Vol. 47, No. 8–9, pp. 6–8.
10. Dehler M. Optical sorting of ceramic raw materials. Tiles and Bricks International, 2003, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 248–251.
11. Harbek H. Optoelectronic separation in feldspar processing at Maffei Sarda. Aufbereitungs Technik, 2001, Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 438–444.
12. Alekhin A. A., Gorbunova E. V., Chertov A. N., Petukhova D. B. Optical-electronic system for express analysis of mineral raw materials dressability by color sorting method. Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XII; and Automated Visual Inspection. Proceedings of SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2013, Vol. 8791, p. 87911N.
13. Vakulenko A. D., Gorbunova E. V., Chertov A. N. Аpplicability criteria of the color spaces for optical-electronic minerals color analysis systems. Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy Vestnik Informatsionnykh Tekhnologiy, Mekhaniki i Optiki = Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics, 2012, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 156–157.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back